Category Archives: crown

Beautifully Black, Beauty, Black Beauty, black beauty standards, Black Beauty Standards Research, crown

Crowned in Black Beauty

Black beauty is not a recent invention, nor is it something that began when the world finally decided to acknowledge it. It existed long before magazines, beauty campaigns, fashion runways, social media, and commercial advertisements began placing Black faces before global audiences. It existed in the faces of African mothers, the elegance of African queens, the artistry of African hairstyles, the richness of dark skin illuminated by sunlight, and the countless facial features passed from one generation to another. Black beauty did not need to be created. It needed to be recognized.

To be crowned in Black beauty is to understand that beauty does not have a single architectural design. There is no universal nose, lip shape, eye shape, complexion, cheekbone, or hair texture that determines whether a person is beautiful. Black people possess an extraordinary range of physical characteristics because the African diaspora encompasses enormous genetic and cultural diversity. From the deepest ebony complexions to lighter brown and golden tones, from tightly coiled hair to looser curls and waves, Black beauty exists across a remarkable spectrum.

The Black face itself deserves appreciation as an artistic composition. High cheekbones, broad or narrow noses, full lips, almond-shaped or round eyes, prominent or subtle jawlines, facial symmetry, distinctive profiles, and countless combinations of features contribute to the individuality of Black faces. Two people can both be unmistakably Black while looking completely different from one another. That diversity challenges the idea that Black beauty must conform to a single recognizable aesthetic.

Melanin is another dimension of this beauty. Brown skin is not simply a color; it is a spectrum. Human skin pigmentation is influenced by multiple genetic factors, particularly variations affecting melanin production and distribution. The result is an extraordinary range of complexions. Deep brown, mahogany, chestnut, caramel, copper, golden brown, and other shades represent variations within humanity rather than different measures of worth. No shade should have to compete with another for permission to be considered beautiful.

Two women posing in black and light-blue formal evening gowns

For generations, however, colorism has complicated the relationship many Black people have with their own skin. Within and beyond Black communities, lighter skin has sometimes been associated with privilege, desirability, proximity to European beauty standards, or social status. Darker-skinned individuals have consequently faced stereotypes and discrimination that cannot be dismissed as merely personal preferences. Colorism demonstrates how ideas about beauty can become intertwined with history, power, colonialism, and social hierarchy.

Yet dark skin possesses an extraordinary visual presence. Deep complexions can appear luminous beneath natural sunlight, dramatic beneath studio lighting, and striking against virtually every color imaginable. Black skin reflects light differently according to complexion, texture, and environment, producing visual variations that photographers, painters, makeup artists, and filmmakers have increasingly explored. The deeper the complexion, the more society should learn to see its beauty rather than project old prejudices onto it.

Black hair deserves its own crown. Hair has always been more than an accessory within Black communities. Braids, twists, locs, afros, cornrows, coils, curls, pressed styles, natural textures, wigs, extensions, and countless other forms of styling represent creativity and self-expression. African hairstyling traditions existed for centuries before modern beauty industries discovered the commercial possibilities of textured hair. Hair can communicate identity, heritage, creativity, spirituality, maturity, status, and personal preference.

The natural hair movement helped challenge the assumption that Black hair needed to be altered to become beautiful or professional. It also revealed how deeply appearance can be connected to social expectations. Choosing natural hair can be liberating, but the decision should ultimately belong to the individual. Black beauty should never become another rigid uniform. A woman wearing an afro is beautiful. A woman wearing braids is beautiful. A woman wearing locs is beautiful. A woman wearing a wig is beautiful. Her beauty does not disappear when her hairstyle changes.

There is something equally powerful about Black women who refuse to choose between softness and strength. Black femininity has frequently been portrayed through contradictory stereotypes: the hyperstrong woman, the caregiver, the angry woman, the hypersexualized woman, the maternal figure, or the supposedly invulnerable woman. These stereotypes flatten the complexity of real women. Black women can be delicate and powerful, glamorous and intellectual, reserved and expressive, traditional and unconventional. Beauty does not require the elimination of personality.

Black beauty also belongs to Black men. The conversation surrounding beauty often focuses disproportionately on women, yet Black masculinity contains its own extraordinary aesthetic diversity. Facial hair, facial structure, skin complexion, body proportions, hairstyles, locs, afros, waves, natural textures, and personal style contribute to the visual diversity of Black men. The beauty of Blackness is not restricted to femininity. It encompasses fathers, sons, brothers, husbands, grandfathers, elders, athletes, artists, scholars, workers, and ordinary men whose faces tell stories of ancestry.

Children deserve to see this beauty before society teaches them to question it. A Black child should not have to grow into adulthood before discovering that their complexion is worthy, their nose is beautiful, their lips are beautiful, their hair is beautiful, and their features are worthy of admiration. Representation matters because children construct ideas about themselves partly through the images surrounding them. When they repeatedly encounter beauty that resembles themselves, the mirror becomes a place of recognition rather than correction.

Photography has an important role in this process. For decades, technical limitations and cultural assumptions sometimes resulted in darker skin being poorly represented in photographic imagery. Modern photographers have increasingly demonstrated what happens when Black skin is intentionally illuminated, accurately exposed, and treated as worthy of artistic attention. Proper representation does not merely make photographs technically better. It changes what audiences learn to notice.

Fashion has also become an important arena for Black beauty. Designers, models, stylists, makeup artists, and creative directors have demonstrated that Black bodies can carry virtually every aesthetic imaginable. High fashion, streetwear, traditional African-inspired clothing, minimalist design, couture, and contemporary styles can all interact with Black identity. The Black body does not need to adapt itself to fashion; fashion can be interpreted through the Black body in countless ways.

There is also beauty in African ancestry itself. Across the continent of Africa are hundreds of peoples, languages, cultures, histories, and physical variations. It is therefore inaccurate to imagine one universal “African appearance.” The diversity found throughout Africa is reflected throughout the African diaspora. Black beauty can carry ancestral echoes without requiring every Black person to look alike. Diversity is not a contradiction of Black identity; it is one of its defining characteristics.

Science can help explain physical variation, but it cannot determine beauty by itself. Facial symmetry, averageness, skin quality, youthfulness, and certain proportions have been studied in the scientific literature on attractiveness, yet human perceptions of beauty are also shaped by culture, familiarity, social learning, individual experience, and historical context. Beauty therefore cannot be reduced to a mathematical equation. The human face is biological, but the meaning assigned to that face is profoundly cultural.

This is why the celebration of Black beauty should not simply replace one narrow standard with another. The objective should be greater freedom. A dark-skinned woman should not have to prove that dark skin is superior to lighter skin. A woman with a broad nose should not have to argue that her nose is better than a narrow one. Full lips should not become another requirement. Curly hair should not become another uniform expectation. Black beauty becomes more powerful when individuality is allowed to exist within the larger category.

To be crowned in Black beauty is therefore not to wear an imaginary crown above everyone else. It is to stop living beneath someone else’s definition of beauty. It is to look into the mirror without immediately searching for something that needs correction. It is to recognize ancestry without romanticizing it, celebrate individuality without comparing it, and appreciate physical features without allowing appearance to become the foundation of human worth.

Perhaps the most beautiful aspect of Black beauty is its refusal to be reduced to one image. There is beauty in dark skin and light brown skin. There is beauty in short hair and long hair. There is beauty in coils, curls, braids, locs, afros, and straight styles. There is beauty in broad noses and narrow noses, full lips and thinner lips, round faces and angular faces. There is beauty in youthful faces and mature faces. Black beauty does not exist as one face. It exists as millions of faces.

And perhaps that is what it means to be crowned in Black beauty: not to seek permission, validation, or comparison, but to recognize what has always been there. The crown is not something the world places upon the head of a Black woman after finally deciding she is beautiful enough. The crown begins with recognition. It is the recognition that Blackness contains extraordinary variation, that African features deserve admiration, that dark skin deserves tenderness, that Black hair deserves freedom, and that no historical beauty hierarchy has the authority to determine the value of a human being.

Black beauty is not a trend. It is not a marketing campaign. It is not a temporary cultural fascination. It is not dependent upon fashion cycles or social-media algorithms. It is living, changing, diverse, ancestral, contemporary, and profoundly human. To be crowned in Black beauty is to understand that the crown was never waiting for someone else to give it away. It was already there—in the skin, in the features, in the hair, in the heritage, in the individuality, and in the countless faces of a people whose beauty has always been far greater than any single definition could contain.

Love what we do? Help us continue the work.
Your donation helps support independent content, meaningful storytelling, education, representation, and the continued growth of The Brown Girl Dilemma. Every contribution makes a difference.

Thank you for supporting the vision. 

CashApp: https://cash.app/$thebrowngirlnetwork

References

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.

Dixon, A. R., & Telles, E. E. (2017). Skin color and colorism: Global research, concepts, and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 405–424.

Hunter, M. L. (2005). Race, gender, and the politics of skin tone. Routledge.

Keith, V. M., & Herring, C. (1991). Skin tone and stratification in the Black community. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 760–778.

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659.

Maddox, K. B., & Chase, S. G. (2004). Manipulating subcategory salience: Exploring the link between skin tone and perceptions of Black women. Psychological Science, 15(9), 610–614.

Robinson, S. A. (2011). Black women and the politics of hair. University Press.

Thompson, C. (2009). Black women and identity: What’s hair got to do with it? Michigan Feminist Studies, 23, 78–90.

Thompson, M. S., & Keith, V. M. (2001). The Blacker the Berry: Gender, skin tone, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Gender & Society, 15(3), 336–357.

Willis, L. E., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598.

a brown girl's beauty, Beautifully Black, Beauty, Black Beauty, black beauty standards, Black Beauty Standards Research, crown, smart brown girl

Seen, Chosen, and Consumed

Her Crown…

She walks into the room, and the air shifts. She is seen — every eye catches her presence, but not in a superficial glance. Her beauty commands attention because it is more than skin deep; it is history, resilience, and identity embodied. Her dark skin glows like polished mahogany in light and shadow, her features perfectly sculpted by generations of ancestors, her posture regal without effort.

Being chosen is not merely a reflection of desire — it is an acknowledgment of power, intellect, lineage, and spirit. People gravitate toward her, drawn not only to her physical beauty but to the energy she radiates: confidence, warmth, and an unspoken authority. That energy tells the world she knows her worth and expects it to be recognized.

Consumed is not a word for her; it is the effect she has on those who underestimate her depth. Her beauty is both aesthetic and magnetic, spiritual and commanding. To consume her presence is to experience her essence, her laughter, her thought, and her gaze — all at once. She is layered, complex, and irresistible, yet no one can fully possess her.

Black beauty has always been revolutionary. In her, it is the fusion of the sacred and the aesthetic, a living testimony to what society tried to suppress. Her melanin is not a pigment but a crown, her hair not a trend but a declaration, her lips not merely curves but a symbol of ancestry and expression. To see her is to witness history alive.

Her intellect is inseparable from her allure. The conversations she inspires, the ideas she shares, and the insight she offers are just as compelling as her physical form. Being chosen means being respected, not only admired — she attracts those who see beyond skin-deep charm and recognize the fullness of her mind and soul.

The way she moves is poetry. Every gesture, from a subtle tilt of her head to the curve of her smile, carries rhythm, grace, and self-possession. She has been consumed by expectations before, yet she moves beyond them, defining her own narrative and teaching the world that her beauty is sovereign.

In her joy, she is luminous. Her laughter resonates like music, her confidence radiates warmth, and her presence encourages others to embrace themselves fully. She embodies the good things about Black women: strength, resilience, beauty, intelligence, and love, all intertwined seamlessly in one person.

She has known struggle, yet it has not diminished her; rather, it has enhanced her depth. Every challenge, every barrier, and every act of resistance has shaped her into someone who is not only seen, chosen, and consumed but also respected and revered. Her beauty is a story of survival and triumph.

She inspires artistry, admiration, and emulation. From fashion to culture, from professional achievement to personal grace, she is a muse and a model, teaching the world the meaning of elegance, poise, and authenticity. Her essence is timeless, her power undeniable.

Ultimately, she is more than a reflection of desire or admiration. She is a symbol of the sacredness of Black womanhood, a living reminder that beauty, intellect, and spirit can coexist in harmony. She is seen for who she is, chosen for what she offers, and consumed not as an object but as a force of nature — radiant, untamed, and unforgettable.

References

Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.

hooks, b. (2000). All about love: New visions. William Morrow.

Morrison, T. (1992). Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. Harvard University Press.

Walker, A. (1982). The color purple. Harcourt.

Williams, P. (2019). Phenomenal Black women: The beauty, power, and legacy of African American women. HarperCollins.

crown, curses

The Crown and the Curse

Beauty has often been described as a crown—something worn, admired, and envied. Yet for many women, especially Black women, this crown is inseparable from a curse. What appears as privilege on the surface frequently conceals a deeper system of control, punishment, and vulnerability that accompanies visibility and desirability.

Historically, beauty has never been neutral. It has functioned as a social marker that determines who is protected, who is believed, and who is disposable. The crown of beauty grants access to attention and opportunity, but it also places its bearer under constant surveillance, judgment, and expectation.

For Black women, this contradiction is intensified by racialized beauty hierarchies. When beauty aligns with Eurocentric ideals, it may offer conditional favor, yet that favor is fragile and revocable. When beauty reflects African features, it is often hypersexualized, exoticized, or framed as threatening. In both cases, beauty becomes a site of regulation rather than liberation.

The curse emerges in the loss of autonomy. Beautiful women are rarely allowed to simply exist. Their bodies are read as public property, open to commentary, entitlement, and projection. Compliments quickly shift into assumptions, demands, or moral scrutiny, revealing how admiration can mutate into control.

This dynamic is deeply rooted in history. During slavery and colonialism, the bodies of women of African descent were commodified and violated under the guise of fascination and desire. Beauty did not shield them from violence; instead, it made them more vulnerable to exploitation. The crown, from its inception, carried a curse.

In modern contexts, this curse persists through media and social institutions. Beautiful women are elevated visually but diminished intellectually. Their success is often attributed to appearance rather than competence, reinforcing the belief that beauty negates merit. This framing undermines credibility and invites resentment.

Power further complicates the burden. A woman who is both beautiful and authoritative destabilizes patriarchal norms. As a result, she may face heightened backlash, characterized by character assassination, rumors, and exaggerated scrutiny. Her crown becomes evidence against her rather than a neutral trait.

Colorism operates as an internal extension of this curse. Within marginalized communities, lighter skin and certain features may be crowned as ideal, while darker skin is devalued. This hierarchy reproduces colonial logic and fractures communal solidarity, turning beauty into a tool of division rather than affirmation.

The curse also manifests psychologically. Constant visibility can lead to hypervigilance, anxiety, and self-policing. Women may feel pressured to downplay their appearance, mute their confidence, or shrink their presence to avoid backlash. This internal regulation reflects the success of external control.

Religious and moral narratives have historically reinforced the curse. Women’s beauty has been framed as a source of temptation and disorder, placing responsibility for others’ desires onto female bodies. Such narratives transform beauty into moral liability rather than neutral embodiment.

Economically, the crown is monetized while the curse is ignored. Industries profit from beauty while absolving themselves of responsibility for the harm caused by unattainable standards, harassment, and exploitation. Women are encouraged to invest endlessly in their appearance without protection from the consequences of visibility.

Social relationships are not immune. Beauty can provoke envy, competition, and isolation. Rather than fostering admiration, it may invite hostility or distrust, particularly in environments shaped by scarcity and comparison. The crown isolates as much as it elevates.

The paradox of the crown and the curse exposes a deeper cultural discomfort with women who cannot be easily categorized. Beauty is tolerated only when paired with submission. Power is tolerated only when stripped of desirability. Together, they challenge hierarchies built on control.

Liberation begins with naming the curse. Recognizing that punishment is structural rather than personal allows women to reject shame and reclaim agency. It also challenges communities to confront how admiration can coexist with harm.

Reclaiming the crown requires redefining beauty beyond hierarchy. Beauty must be disentangled from worth, morality, and entitlement. When beauty is no longer a currency that demands payment through silence or submission, the curse begins to weaken.

Collectively, dismantling the curse involves changing narratives, policies, and social norms. It requires believing women regardless of appearance, valuing competence over aesthetics, and rejecting the myth that beauty justifies intrusion or judgment.

The crown does not need to be discarded; it needs to be redeemed. Beauty can exist without punishment when autonomy is respected and humanity is centered. The goal is not invisibility, but safety, dignity, and freedom.

Ultimately, the crown and the curse reveal the cost of living in a world that confuses visibility with entitlement. Until beauty is no longer treated as permission for control, the crown will remain heavy. True justice allows women to wear it without consequence.

The Brown Girl Dilemma: Crowned by Beauty, Crucified by Colorism

References

Collins, P. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. Routledge.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290.

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.

Hunter, M. (2007). The persistent problem of colorism: Skin tone, status, and inequality. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 237–254.

hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. South End Press.

Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. HarperCollins.

biblical marriage, crown, love, marriage, The Black Man

The Crown: Him

A good godly man can be a profound blessing in a woman’s life—not because he completes her, but because his character can complement her own purpose, values, and walk with God. Scripture presents righteous leadership not as domination, but as responsibility, sacrifice, wisdom, protection, and love. The biblical standard for a man is therefore much higher than physical attractiveness, financial success, social status, or charisma. His crown is ultimately revealed through his character.

One of the greatest positives of having a godly man in your life is having someone whose values are anchored in something greater than himself. A man who genuinely seeks God is called to develop humility, self-control, honesty, patience, compassion, and integrity. These qualities can create an environment in which a woman feels respected rather than manipulated and valued rather than objectified. Proverbs 20:7 declares, “The just man walketh in his integrity: his children are blessed after him” (KJV).

A godly man understands that being a man does not mean being controlled by every desire that enters his mind. Biblical manhood requires discipline. Proverbs 25:28 compares a person without self-control to “a city that is broken down, and without walls.” A man who can govern himself demonstrates that his desires do not govern him. This distinction becomes especially important in a culture that frequently teaches men to pursue whatever they want whenever they want it.

Sexual purity before marriage is therefore not merely about denying pleasure; it is about developing character. A man who chooses abstinence before marriage demonstrates that he understands the difference between desire and entitlement. He recognizes that attraction is natural, but acting upon every attraction is a choice. His willingness to wait can demonstrate patience, conviction, and respect for both himself and the woman he intends to marry.

A man who avoids sexual temptation is not necessarily a man who never experiences temptation. Rather, he is a man who understands how temptation works and refuses to deliberately place himself in situations designed to weaken his convictions. Joseph provides one of Scripture’s clearest examples. When confronted with sexual temptation from Potiphar’s wife, Joseph did not negotiate with temptation; he fled from it (Genesis 39:7–12). Sometimes spiritual strength looks less like standing around proving how strong you are and more like knowing when to leave.

Wisdom lies in a man who protects the boundaries of a relationship before marriage. He does not continually test how far he can go physically. He does not use emotional intimacy as a pathway toward sexual gratification. He does not pressure a woman by saying that love must be proven through physical intimacy. Instead, he respects her convictions and establishes boundaries that protect both people.

A godly man also understands that a woman’s body is not his possession simply because he is attracted to her. Biblical love requires honor. First Thessalonians 4:3–5 instructs believers to exercise holiness and self-control rather than living according to uncontrolled passion. A man who genuinely loves a woman should therefore care about her spiritual, emotional, and personal well-being—not merely about gaining access to her body.

Another positive quality is consistency. A godly man should not be righteous only when someone is watching. Character is demonstrated privately as well as publicly. The man who speaks respectfully about women when his friends are present, maintains his boundaries when nobody is monitoring him, and keeps his commitments when there is no immediate reward is demonstrating something far more valuable than outward religious performance.

A good man can also provide emotional stability. This does not mean that he will never struggle, become frustrated, or experience difficult emotions. Rather, maturity means learning how to handle emotions responsibly. A man who can communicate rather than intimidate, apologize rather than manipulate, and listen rather than constantly defend himself creates the possibility for a healthier relationship.

A godly man should also understand the importance of protecting a woman’s dignity. Ephesians 5:25 instructs husbands to love their wives sacrificially, using Christ’s love for the church as the model. This is an extraordinary standard because it places responsibility upon the man to give rather than merely demand. Biblical authority without sacrificial love becomes abuse of power; genuine godly leadership is inseparable from responsibility.

Financial responsibility can also be an important dimension of mature manhood. Scripture does not define a man’s worth by his income, possessions, or social class, but it does emphasize responsibility toward one’s household. First Timothy 5:8 warns against neglecting family responsibilities. A godly man therefore strives to work, provide, plan, and steward resources wisely according to his circumstances rather than expecting a woman to carry responsibilities he refuses to confront.

Wisdom is another quality that makes a good man valuable. Proverbs repeatedly connects wisdom with righteous living. A wise man does not believe he knows everything. He seeks counsel, learns from correction, considers consequences, and recognizes when he is wrong. His confidence does not require arrogance. He can be strong without being harsh and humble without being weak.

A godly man should also possess spiritual accountability. He should have a relationship with God that exists independently of the woman he is dating or hoping to marry. A woman should not have to become his pastor, conscience, therapist, mother, and spiritual caretaker. His faith should be something he personally pursues through prayer, Scripture, obedience, repentance, and fellowship with other believers.

There is also tremendous value in a man who understands covenant rather than merely convenience. Modern relationships can sometimes be built around what two people can obtain from each other. Biblical marriage, however, is covenantal. Malachi 2:14 describes marriage as a covenant, emphasizing faithfulness rather than temporary gratification. A man who desires marriage should therefore be preparing himself for covenantal responsibility rather than simply searching for companionship, sex, or domestic benefits.

A man who can resist temptation can bring a different kind of security into a relationship. No woman can eliminate every temptation a man will encounter, and no man can eliminate every temptation a woman will encounter. Fidelity ultimately depends upon personal character and moral choices. Nevertheless, a man committed to faithfulness will not blame his partner for his decisions. He will take responsibility for guarding his eyes, his thoughts, his associations, his digital life, and his behavior.

Such a man can also encourage a woman to become more—not less—of who God has called her to be. A healthy relationship should not require either person to abandon their gifts, intelligence, aspirations, friendships, or spiritual development. A good man does not fear a woman’s growth. He can celebrate her accomplishments without feeling diminished by them. He understands that partnership is not competition.

A godly man should also know how to apologize and repent. Religious language does not automatically produce righteous character. A man may quote Scripture and still behave selfishly. Genuine godliness becomes visible when a person can acknowledge wrongdoing, seek forgiveness, make restitution where appropriate, and change his behavior. Repentance is one of the strongest indications that faith is producing transformation rather than merely providing vocabulary.

The presence of a good man can also create an atmosphere of peace, but peace should never be confused with perfection. Every relationship will encounter disagreements, disappointments, and difficult seasons. The difference is often found in how two people handle conflict. A mature man does not use silence as punishment, threats as leverage, or anger as a weapon. He seeks reconciliation while maintaining truth and appropriate boundaries.

Ultimately, a woman should not choose a man simply because he wears the appearance of a crown. Crowns can be symbolic, expensive, and impressive while revealing nothing about the heart beneath them. The true crown of a man is his character. His greatest adornment is not his clothing, physique, occupation, education, wealth, or social reputation, but his faithfulness when temptation comes and his integrity when nobody is watching.

The crown of a godly man is therefore not perfection but submission to God. He may stumble, but he gets back up. He may be tempted, but he chooses discipline. He may become angry, but he learns self-control. He may make mistakes, but he accepts correction. He may desire intimacy, but he honors the boundaries established before marriage. His strength is demonstrated not by how much he can take from a woman, but by how much he is willing to sacrifice to honor God and protect her dignity.

A woman who desires such a man should likewise remember that she is not merely waiting for someone worthy of her; she is also becoming the person capable of sustaining a healthy covenant. The goal should not be to find a flawless king or to become a flawless queen. The goal is to find two people whose lives are increasingly submitted to God, whose relationship is governed by love and truth, and whose commitment to one another is stronger than the temporary pleasures competing for their attention. Proverbs 31:10 asks, “Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.” In a similar spirit, a righteous man is a treasure because his character cannot be purchased.

References

Holy Bible, King James Version. (1611/1769). The Holy Bible. Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, C. S. (1960). The four loves. Geoffrey Bles.

Merton, T. (1961). New seeds of contemplation. New Directions.

Murray, J. (1954). Principles of Christian conduct. Eerdmans.

Peterson, E. H. (2005). The message: The Bible in contemporary language. NavPress.

Stott, J. R. W. (2006). The cross of Christ. InterVarsity Press.

Wilcox, W. B. (2004). Soft patriarchs, new men: How Christianity shapes fathers and husbands. University of Chicago Press.

Wright, N. T. (2010). After you believe: Why Christian character matters. HarperOne.

biblical marriage, black woman, Black Women, crown, love, marriage, The Marriage Series

The Crown: Her

A godly woman possesses a beauty that extends far beyond physical appearance. Her crown is not merely found in her hair, clothing, jewelry, accomplishments, or the attention she receives from men. Her greatest adornment is character. Scripture presents the virtuous woman as someone whose value cannot be measured by outward beauty alone. Proverbs 31:10 declares, “Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies” (KJV).

One of the greatest blessings of having a godly woman in a man’s life is wisdom, encouragement, and spiritual companionship. A woman who genuinely seeks God can bring a perspective shaped by prayer, discernment, compassion, and faith. She does not seek a relationship merely for companionship or material security; she desires one in which both people can grow spiritually and morally.

A godly woman understands that her body has value beyond sexual attraction. She does not measure her worth by how much attention she receives or how many men desire her. Her body is not a commodity, and her femininity does not require her to compromise her convictions. First Corinthians 6:19–20 reminds believers that the body is a temple of the Holy Spirit and should therefore be treated with honor.

Sexual purity before marriage can be an expression of self-respect, obedience, and spiritual conviction. A woman who chooses to wait is not declaring that sexuality is evil; she is recognizing that sexual intimacy carries significance and belongs within the covenant of marriage. Her decision to establish boundaries communicates that she values the relationship enough not to allow physical desire to dictate its direction.

A woman committed to purity also understands that temptation is real. She does not pretend that attraction disappears simply because she has religious convictions. Instead, she develops wisdom concerning situations, conversations, environments, and relationships that could weaken her boundaries. Second Timothy 2:22 instructs believers to flee youthful lusts and pursue righteousness, faith, charity, and peace.

A virtuous woman therefore does not continually place herself in situations where she must prove how strong her willpower is. Wisdom sometimes means recognizing danger before it becomes a crisis. She understands that boundaries are not punishments; they are protective structures. A woman who establishes healthy boundaries is not being difficult or prudish. She is exercising discernment concerning what she believes her body, heart, and future are worth.

A godly woman also refuses to manipulate a man through sexuality. She does not use intimacy as a bargaining tool, weapon, reward, or means of maintaining control. Likewise, she does not allow herself to be pressured into sexual behavior simply because someone claims that physical intimacy is proof of love. Genuine love is patient and honorable. First Corinthians 13:5 teaches that love “seeketh not her own.”

Emotional purity matters as well. A woman can become deeply attached to someone without having sexual intercourse. Emotional intimacy can create powerful bonds, and wisdom requires recognizing when a relationship is becoming disproportionately intimate without the covenant of marriage. A godly woman learns to guard not only her body but also her heart.

Proverbs 4:23 offers the foundational principle: “Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life.” Guarding the heart does not mean becoming cold or incapable of love. It means refusing to give unrestricted access to people who have not demonstrated the character, commitment, and intentions necessary to handle that access responsibly.

A godly woman also understands the difference between attention and genuine love. Being pursued does not necessarily mean being valued. A man can compliment a woman, desire her, buy her gifts, or shower her with attention without possessing the character necessary for a healthy marriage. Discernment allows a woman to look beyond what a man says and examine how he lives.

A wise woman therefore observes consistency. Does he respect her boundaries? Does he honor his commitments? Does he demonstrate self-control? Does he treat other people with dignity? Does his private behavior correspond with his public testimony? These questions can reveal far more about a man’s character than romantic words ever could.

A godly woman should likewise cultivate financial wisdom. Scripture praises stewardship, diligence, prudence, and responsible management. Proverbs 31 portrays a woman who evaluates property, works with her hands, considers investments, provides for her household, and conducts herself with wisdom. Her femininity does not require financial ignorance. She can be nurturing while also being economically intelligent.

The virtuous woman is also industrious. Proverbs 31 does not portray her as passive or without purpose. She works, plans, creates, manages, serves, and makes decisions. Her strength is not presented as a contradiction of femininity. Instead, strength and femininity coexist within her character. She can be gentle without being weak and confident without becoming arrogant.

A godly woman also possesses the courage to say no. This is an essential dimension of wisdom. Saying no to an unsuitable relationship, inappropriate behavior, sexual temptation, financial irresponsibility, manipulation, or disrespect may be painful in the moment, but boundaries can preserve the future. A woman who cannot say no to what is wrong will eventually have difficulty protecting what is right.

Another beautiful quality is emotional maturity. A mature woman understands that not every disagreement requires an explosion, not every disappointment requires revenge, and not every offense requires public exposure. She learns how to communicate, listen, forgive, confront appropriately, and walk away when necessary. Proverbs 31:26 says, “She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness.”

A godly woman does not need to destroy another woman to establish her own beauty. She understands that comparison can become a form of bondage. Another woman’s beauty does not subtract from hers. Another woman’s success does not make her unsuccessful. Another woman’s marriage does not mean that God has forgotten her. Confidence allows a woman to celebrate others without feeling threatened by them.

She also understands that physical beauty is temporary. Youth changes. Bodies change. Fashion changes. Hair changes. Circumstances change. A woman who builds her identity entirely upon physical appearance eventually discovers that the foundation was never strong enough to carry her through life. First Peter 3:3–4 emphasizes the importance of the “hidden man of the heart,” pointing toward an inward beauty characterized by a gentle and quiet spirit.

This does not mean that a godly woman cannot enjoy fashion, cosmetics, jewelry, beautiful clothing, or physical attractiveness. Scripture does not require women to neglect their appearance. Rather, outward beauty should never become more important than inward character. A woman may wear a beautiful crown, but the crown should symbolize something greater than vanity: dignity, wisdom, responsibility, and grace.

A godly woman also understands the importance of choosing a husband carefully. Marriage is too significant to be entered solely because a man is handsome, wealthy, sexually attractive, popular, or exciting. Character matters. Spiritual maturity matters. Self-control matters. Responsibility matters. A woman’s future can be profoundly affected by the man she chooses, which makes discernment one of her greatest forms of wisdom.

She should also resist the temptation to believe that she can transform an unwilling man into a godly husband. Love can encourage people, but love cannot substitute for another person’s willingness to change. A woman should not marry potential while ignoring present character. If a man consistently demonstrates dishonesty, sexual immorality, irresponsibility, cruelty, addiction, or contempt for her boundaries, romantic feelings should not blind her to reality.

The same principle applies to her own character. A godly woman does not demand from a man qualities that she refuses to cultivate herself. If she desires honesty, she should practice honesty. If she desires fidelity, she should practice fidelity. If she desires self-control, she should develop self-control. If she desires spiritual leadership, she should become spiritually mature enough to participate meaningfully in a godly marriage.

Ultimately, the crown of a woman is not the attention she commands but the character she carries. Her greatest beauty is revealed when nobody is applauding her. It is revealed in how she treats people who cannot benefit her, how she handles temptation, how she responds to disappointment, how she protects her dignity, how she honors God, and how she conducts herself when nobody is watching.

The crown of a godly woman is therefore not perfection. It is a life continually being refined by wisdom, faith, repentance, discipline, and love. She can be beautiful and intelligent, feminine and strong, compassionate and discerning, graceful and courageous. She does not have to choose between beauty and substance. Her outward beauty can be an expression of her creativity, while her inward beauty becomes the foundation upon which her entire life stands.

A woman wearing a crown should remember what the crown represents. It represents responsibility before it represents privilege. It represents dignity before attention. It represents wisdom before popularity. It represents self-control before desire. And above all, it represents a life submitted to God. Proverbs 31:30 provides the final measure: “Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised.” The crown may shine upon her head, but it is the character within her heart that makes her truly worthy of it.

References

Holy Bible, King James Version. (1611/1769). The Holy Bible. Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, C. S. (1960). The four loves. Geoffrey Bles.

Merton, T. (1961). New seeds of contemplation. New Directions.

Murray, J. (1954). Principles of Christian conduct. Eerdmans.

Peterson, E. H. (2005). The message: The Bible in contemporary language. NavPress.

Stott, J. R. W. (2006). The cross of Christ. InterVarsity Press.

Wilcox, W. B. (2004). Soft patriarchs, new men: How Christianity shapes fathers and husbands. University of Chicago Press.

Wright, N. T. (2010). After you believe: Why Christian character matters. HarperOne.

bible, biblical marriage, crown, marriage, The Marriage Series

Who Wears the Biggest Crown? The Black Man or the Black Woman?

The question of who wears the biggest crown—the Black man or the Black woman—is ultimately a question that reaches beyond gender, beauty, authority, achievement, or social status. A crown represents dignity, responsibility, honor, and authority. Yet from a biblical perspective, the highest crown does not belong to either man or woman independently. The highest crown belongs to the Most High, whose sovereignty transcends every human distinction. “For thou, LORD, art the most high above all the earth: thou art exalted far above all gods” (Psalm 97:9, KJV). Human beings may possess dignity and authority, but all legitimate authority remains subordinate to God.

Within the biblical understanding of family, the Black man and Black woman are not competitors for the same throne. They possess distinct responsibilities while sharing fundamental human dignity as bearers of God’s image. Genesis declares that both male and female were created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). Therefore, biblical headship should never be interpreted as evidence that a woman is less valuable than a man. Likewise, female strength should not require the destruction or humiliation of masculine responsibility. The biblical model is better understood as ordered partnership rather than a contest for supremacy.

For the Black man, the crown represents more than physical appearance, masculinity, financial success, or social status. It represents responsibility. Scripture presents the husband as having a particular responsibility toward his household. Ephesians 5:23 describes the husband as “the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church” (KJV). This passage establishes a model of leadership that cannot legitimately be separated from sacrifice. The man who wants the crown of leadership must also accept the weight that comes with it.

Biblical leadership is therefore not permission for domination. Christ’s example fundamentally changes the meaning of authority. Ephesians 5:25 commands husbands to love their wives “as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it” (KJV). The standard is extraordinary self-sacrifice. A man cannot reasonably demand obedience, honor, or submission while refusing the corresponding responsibilities of protection, provision, fidelity, emotional maturity, and sacrificial love. A crown without responsibility becomes merely decoration.

The concept of the man as provider is also deeply connected to biblical responsibility. First Timothy 5:8 states that a person who fails to provide for his household has denied the faith. Although economic circumstances differ across generations and households, the principle remains significant: responsible manhood includes a serious commitment to the welfare of one’s family. Provision, however, should not be reduced exclusively to money. A man can provide security, wisdom, discipline, affection, spiritual leadership, stability, and protection. Financial provision matters, but biblical provision encompasses the whole household.

The Black woman, meanwhile, carries her own crown. Scripture does not portray womanhood as weakness or insignificance. Proverbs 31 presents a woman who is economically productive, intellectually capable, discerning, industrious, charitable, and respected within her community. She considers a field and purchases it, makes merchandise, strengthens her household, and speaks with wisdom (Proverbs 31:16–26). Her strength does not erase her femininity. Instead, her wisdom and capability become part of the glory of her womanhood.

The biblical instruction for a wife to follow her husband’s leadership therefore should not be interpreted as a command to surrender intelligence, conscience, dignity, or moral discernment. Ephesians 5:22–24 places wives within a framework of marital submission, but the passage immediately surrounds that instruction with an extraordinarily demanding command to husbands to love sacrificially. Biblical submission cannot be separated from biblical responsibility. If the husband is called to lead, his leadership must resemble Christ rather than tyranny.

A woman following her husband’s lead, within this biblical framework, is not necessarily a statement that she is inferior. It can represent trust, cooperation, order, and covenantal partnership. Two people cannot effectively lead the same household in opposite directions. Leadership requires someone to accept ultimate responsibility, while partnership requires both people to contribute wisdom and strength. Proverbs 31 demonstrates that a woman can be highly capable while functioning within a marriage where her husband occupies a recognized position of family leadership.

The Black woman should therefore never have to become less intelligent, less ambitious, less articulate, or less accomplished to honor biblical femininity. The biblical woman can be strong without becoming masculine, and she can be submissive without becoming voiceless. Her crown is not diminished because she respects her husband’s leadership. Indeed, Proverbs 31:28 says that her children rise up and call her blessed, while her husband praises her. Honor flows in both directions.

Likewise, the Black man should not believe that masculinity requires emotional hardness, arrogance, irresponsibility, sexual conquest, or domination. Those qualities may be celebrated by portions of contemporary culture, but they do not represent the highest biblical ideal of manhood. Christ demonstrated strength through service. He washed feet, protected the vulnerable, confronted hypocrisy, showed compassion, and ultimately sacrificed Himself. The biblical man is therefore called to possess strength under discipline rather than strength without restraint.

This distinction is particularly meaningful when considering the historical experiences of Black men and Black women. Both have endured systems that attempted to deny their dignity, separate families, exploit labor, and impose degrading stereotypes upon Black identity. Historical scholarship on slavery and racial hierarchy demonstrates that Black families were repeatedly subjected to forces that undermined family stability and autonomy (Davis, 1981; Franklin & Moss, 2000). Consequently, discussions about Black masculinity and femininity should acknowledge history rather than pretend that contemporary family dynamics developed in isolation.

Black women have historically carried enormous responsibilities within Black families and communities. Black men have likewise confronted circumstances that attacked their economic opportunities, social standing, and ability to exercise authority over their households. Recognizing these historical realities should not become an argument for permanent competition between Black men and Black women. Instead, history can teach the importance of rebuilding relationships in which both sexes are treated as valuable, responsible, and worthy of dignity.

The question, then, is not really which one deserves the larger crown. If the Black man and Black woman are both attempting to wear the crown of supremacy over one another, both have misunderstood the purpose of the crown. Scripture repeatedly warns against pride and self-exaltation. James 4:6 declares that “God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble” (KJV). The greatest crown is therefore not obtained by defeating one’s spouse. It is received through humility before God.

The Most High remains above every earthly crown. Psalm 24:10 asks, “Who is this King of glory? The LORD of hosts, he is the King of glory” (KJV). This theological principle establishes the proper hierarchy: God is sovereign, human beings are His creation, and every form of human authority is accountable to Him. A husband is not God over his wife. A wife is not God over her husband. Neither possesses unlimited authority over the other.

This distinction becomes especially important when discussing the phrase “the man is the head.” Biblical headship should be understood as accountable leadership rather than unrestricted power. A husband who claims authority while neglecting his wife, children, finances, fidelity, character, or spiritual responsibilities is not demonstrating the fullness of biblical headship. Authority divorced from responsibility becomes oppression. Leadership joined to sacrifice becomes service.

The woman, similarly, should not interpret her crown as a license to despise masculine leadership or compete with her husband for superiority. A marriage in which both individuals continually attempt to prove who is more powerful becomes a battlefield rather than a covenant. Scripture instead presents marriage as a relationship requiring love, respect, fidelity, sacrifice, wisdom, and mutual concern. Ephesians 5:21 begins the larger discussion by instructing believers to submit themselves “one to another in the fear of God” (KJV). Whatever differences in marital roles may be understood from the passage, Christian marriage cannot be reduced to unilateral selfishness.

There is also a profound cultural dimension to reclaiming healthy Black masculinity and femininity. In a society that frequently commodifies Black bodies, stereotypes Black relationships, and measures human worth through wealth and appearance, both Black men and Black women need a definition of dignity that is deeper than cultural approval. The Black man does not need to prove his worth through domination. The Black woman does not need to prove hers through independence from every form of partnership. Their deepest worth precedes their accomplishments because it originates in being created in the image of God.

The crown therefore becomes a symbol of stewardship. If God gives a man authority, he must steward it. If God gives a woman wisdom, she must steward it. If God gives a family children, both parents must steward them. If God gives wealth, it must be stewarded. If God gives influence, it must be stewarded. Nothing placed upon the human head eliminates accountability to the One who placed it there. The crown is never merely a privilege; it is a responsibility.

Perhaps the most beautiful answer is that the Black man and Black woman can both wear crowns without fighting over whose is larger. The man can wear the crown of responsible leadership, sacrificial love, protection, and provision. The woman can wear the crown of wisdom, strength, dignity, nurture, discernment, and partnership. Their crowns do not have to compete because their ultimate allegiance is not to one another but to the Most High. Their relationship becomes strongest when both understand that their authority is received, not self-created.

Ultimately, however, every earthly crown is temporary. Wealth fades. Beauty changes. Careers end. Physical strength diminishes. Social recognition disappears. Even human kingdoms eventually pass away. But the sovereignty of the Most High remains. Revelation 19:12 describes Christ wearing “many crowns” (KJV), emphasizing divine kingship that surpasses every earthly claim to glory. The Black man may wear a crown. The Black woman may wear a crown. But neither wears the highest crown.

So, who wears the biggest crown—the Black man or the Black woman? Neither. The Most High wears the greatest crown. The Black man is called to lead with sacrificial responsibility rather than domination. The Black woman is called to walk in dignity, wisdom, strength, and honorable partnership rather than inferiority. When both submit themselves to God, their crowns become symbols not of competition but of purpose. The highest form of Black excellence is therefore not a man defeating a woman or a woman defeating a man; it is a people discovering how to live with dignity, responsibility, love, wisdom, and reverence before the King above every king.

If this work has informed or inspired you, please consider supporting it so we can continue researching, writing, and sharing these stories.

CashApp: $thebrowngirlnetwork

References

Davis, A. Y. (1981). Women, race, & class. Random House.

Franklin, J. H., & Moss, A. A., Jr. (2000). From slavery to freedom: A history of African Americans (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Holy Bible, King James Version. (1611/1769). The Holy Bible.

Hooks, B. (2004). We real cool: Black men and masculinity. Routledge.

Hunter, M. (2005). Race, gender, and the politics of skin tone. Routledge.

Lerner, G. (1972). Early community work of Black club women. The Journal of Negro History, 59(2), 158–167.

Proverbs 31 Ministries. (n.d.). Proverbs 31. In Holy Bible, King James Version.

The Holy Bible. (KJV). Genesis 1:27; Psalm 24:10; Psalm 97:9; Proverbs 31:10–31; Ephesians 5:21–33; 1 Timothy 5:8; James 4:6; Revelation 19:12.

crown, the golden cage, the golden fleece

Crowned in Gold

Gold has occupied a remarkable place in human civilization for thousands of years. It has been used to symbolize royalty, wealth, divine favor, beauty, achievement, and permanence across numerous cultures. To be “crowned in gold” therefore carries a meaning far deeper than wearing expensive jewelry. The image evokes distinction, dignity, celebration, and the recognition of something considered precious. Within the context of Black beauty, gold creates a particularly powerful visual language because it can illuminate the richness and dimensionality of Black skin while connecting contemporary beauty with ancient traditions of African adornment.

Across the African continent, gold has historically been associated with political authority, commerce, spirituality, and artistic achievement. Ancient Nubia and the kingdoms of West Africa developed sophisticated relationships with gold, while the Akan states became particularly renowned for gold production and goldsmithing. The Asante kingdom, in particular, incorporated gold into royal regalia, ceremonial objects, architecture, and political symbolism. Gold was not simply a commodity; it could communicate rank, authority, continuity, and sacred significance (Ross, 2002).

The historical relationship between West Africa and gold is especially important when examining images of Black people adorned in gold. The medieval Ghana Empire and later West African states participated in extensive trans-Saharan trade networks in which gold was exchanged for salt and other commodities. By the medieval period, West African gold had become an important component of international commerce. Mansa Musa, the famous ruler of the Mali Empire, became one of history’s most celebrated examples of the political and economic power associated with West African gold (Levtzion & Hopkins, 2000).

Gold also possesses unusual physical characteristics that contribute to its symbolic appeal. Unlike many other metals, gold resists corrosion and oxidation under ordinary environmental conditions. Its enduring luster has therefore made it an especially powerful metaphor for permanence. A crown made of gold does not merely communicate wealth; it visually suggests something that endures. In artistic representation, gold can consequently symbolize a person’s lasting value, legacy, dignity, or significance.

The visual relationship between gold and dark skin is particularly striking. Gold jewelry, metallic fabrics, crowns, earrings, bracelets, necklaces, and other adornments can create dramatic contrasts against richly pigmented skin. Light reflects from gold surfaces while being absorbed and reflected differently by melanin-rich skin, creating a layered visual effect. Photography and portraiture can use this relationship deliberately to emphasize facial contours, cheekbones, eyes, lips, shoulders, and overall presence.

Melanin itself is a biological pigment responsible for much of the coloration of human skin, hair, and eyes. Human pigmentation evolved through complex interactions among genetics, geography, and ultraviolet radiation. Populations with ancestors from regions experiencing high ultraviolet exposure generally developed greater concentrations of protective melanin over evolutionary time (Jablonski & Chaplin, 2010). The resulting spectrum of human pigmentation demonstrates that skin color is a biological characteristic with a complex evolutionary history rather than a simple cosmetic category.

Gold can therefore function aesthetically without requiring comparisons between different complexions. A dark-skinned Black woman wearing gold does not become beautiful because gold makes her skin appear lighter, nor does the metal need to alter her natural complexion. Instead, gold can emphasize the existing richness of her skin. The purpose of the adornment is enhancement rather than correction. This distinction allows beauty to be celebrated without creating a hierarchy based upon pigmentation.

Black women have historically used adornment as an expression of identity, status, celebration, spirituality, and personal aesthetics. Headpieces, beads, necklaces, bracelets, earrings, waist adornments, and elaborate hairstyles have appeared in different African societies for centuries. These traditions demonstrate that adornment can transform the human body into a canvas for cultural expression. Modern fashion continues this practice, although contemporary designers frequently reinterpret historical African forms through new materials, silhouettes, and techniques.

The crown is perhaps the most powerful element within the concept of “Crowned in Gold.” Across civilizations, crowns have represented authority and distinction. In African royal traditions, elaborate crowns and headpieces could communicate political status, spiritual legitimacy, lineage, and institutional authority. The crown consequently becomes more than an ornament placed on the head. It becomes a visual statement about identity and position within a broader social and historical structure.

Black male beauty can also be represented through gold. A Black man dressed in formal clothing and adorned with a gold chain, ring, watch, cufflinks, or ceremonial accessory can communicate sophistication, confidence, and refinement. Gold does not belong exclusively to feminine aesthetics. Historically, African kings, chiefs, military leaders, and other figures of authority incorporated gold into male regalia. Contemporary Black men continue to use jewelry and fashion as forms of personal expression.

The male body provides a different visual foundation for gold than the female body, but the artistic principles remain similar. A gold chain can emphasize the neckline and shoulders, while a gold watch or bracelet can accentuate the hands and wrists. A ring can become a subtle focal point, and a gold brooch or cufflink can introduce restrained elegance into formal clothing. The effect can range from understated sophistication to dramatic luxury depending upon the size, design, and placement of the jewelry.

Gold also carries religious and spiritual associations. In many traditions, precious metals have been incorporated into sacred objects, ceremonial architecture, and religious art. Biblical descriptions, for example, frequently associate gold with sacred vessels, temple furnishings, royal wealth, and objects of extraordinary value. Exodus describes extensive use of gold in the construction and furnishing of the Tabernacle, demonstrating the metal’s symbolic significance within ancient Israelite religious practice (Exodus 25–30, King James Version).

The metaphor of being “crowned” can therefore extend beyond material wealth. A crown may represent wisdom, achievement, endurance, dignity, or the culmination of a difficult journey. Someone who has endured hardship and emerged with greater strength can metaphorically be described as crowned. The gold becomes a representation of what survived the fire rather than merely an indication of what was purchased.

This symbolism is especially meaningful when considering Black history. Black communities throughout the African diaspora have endured slavery, colonialism, racial violence, economic exploitation, displacement, and political exclusion while simultaneously producing extraordinary intellectual, artistic, religious, scientific, entrepreneurial, and cultural achievements. To portray Black people as crowned in gold can therefore become a visual rejection of historical narratives that depicted Black humanity as inferior or insignificant.

At the same time, historical celebration should not romanticize the material inequalities that existed within African societies or contemporary communities. African kingdoms were complex political systems containing hierarchies, conflicts, economic relationships, and competing interests. Gold was sometimes connected to systems of labor and trade that were neither simple nor uniformly beneficial. Scholarly examination requires acknowledging that history is complicated while still recognizing the artistic and cultural significance of African gold traditions (Ross, 2002).

The symbolism of gold also appears prominently in contemporary Black fashion and popular culture. Designers, musicians, actors, athletes, models, and entertainers have used gold as a visual expression of achievement and luxury. Gold jewelry can function as a statement of success, while gold clothing can create an almost ceremonial appearance. In editorial photography, gold can transform an ordinary portrait into something resembling a royal painting, particularly when combined with dramatic lighting and carefully composed posture.

There is an important psychological dimension to adornment as well. Clothing and accessories can influence how individuals perceive themselves and how others perceive them. Research in the psychology of dress has suggested that clothing can affect cognition, behavior, and self-perception (Adam & Galinsky, 2012). Jewelry and ceremonial clothing can similarly contribute to a sense of occasion, identity, and confidence. Thus, the crown is not merely something an observer sees; it can also influence how the wearer experiences herself or himself.

Gold also works exceptionally well within portrait photography because of its interaction with light. Reflective surfaces create highlights that can direct attention toward particular areas of the composition. A gold crown can frame the face, while gold earrings can draw attention toward the eyes and cheekbones. A necklace can establish a visual line through the composition. When carefully illuminated, gold becomes almost architectural, helping construct the visual rhythm of a portrait.

Yet the most important crown does not necessarily consist of metal. A person can be “crowned” through character, perseverance, knowledge, creativity, love, leadership, or achievement. The physical crown merely makes an invisible concept visible. This is why the image can be especially powerful when portraying Black men and women: the gold can represent not only material beauty but also the accumulated value of identity, history, resilience, and accomplishment.

“Crowned in Gold” ultimately presents Black beauty as something worthy of ceremonial recognition. The gold is luminous, but the person wearing it remains the center of the composition. Whether depicting a dark-skinned Black woman in an elaborate gold crown, a Black man wearing refined gold accessories, or a group of Black people surrounded by golden light, the central message is one of dignity and distinction. The adornment becomes a frame through which human beauty and cultural history can be observed.

The crown, therefore, becomes both an object and a metaphor. It represents royalty without requiring literal kingship or queenship. It represents achievement without requiring material wealth. It represents beauty without establishing a rigid standard. Most importantly, it allows the wearer to occupy the visual center of the image with confidence. To be crowned in gold is to be presented as precious, enduring, and worthy of attention—not because gold creates that value, but because the gold symbolizes value that was already there.

© 2026 The Brown Girl Dilemma

If this work has informed or inspired you, please consider supporting it so we can continue researching, writing, and sharing these stories.

CashApp: $thebrowngirlnetwork

References

Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.008

Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2010). Colloquium paper: Human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(Supplement 2), 8962–8968. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914628107

Levtzion, N., & Hopkins, J. F. P. (Eds.). (2000). Corpus of early Arabic sources for West African history. Markus Wiener Publishers.

Ross, D. H. (2002). Wrapped in pride: Ghanaian Kente and African American identity. UCLA Fowler Museum of Cultural History.

The Holy Bible, King James Version. (1611). Exodus 25–30.

a brown girl's beauty, Beauty, crown, the brown boy dilemma, the brown girl dilemma, The Brown Girl Experience

Who Deserves the Crown?

Beauty is often presented as though it were an objective truth, a quality that naturally belongs to certain faces and bodies. Yet the history of beauty reveals something far more complicated. The question of who “deserves the crown” is rarely determined by physical appearance alone. Beauty is interpreted through cultural values, historical circumstances, social hierarchies, economics, media institutions, and systems of power. The crown, therefore, is not merely placed upon the head of the most beautiful woman; it is often awarded by those who possess the authority to define beauty in the first place.

For centuries, societies have created standards that distinguish desirable appearances from undesirable ones. Ancient civilizations developed their own ideals concerning proportion, complexion, hair, body shape, youth, and ornamentation. Classical Greek aesthetics emphasized symmetry and proportion, while other cultures developed standards reflecting their own environments and social values. There has never been one universal definition of beauty shared equally across humanity. What is considered beautiful is partly shaped by culture and historical experience.

The modern beauty industry transformed these cultural preferences into commercial institutions. Cosmetics, fashion, advertising, photography, film, television, and eventually social media created enormous markets around the human desire to become more attractive. Beauty ceased to be merely an aesthetic judgment and became an economic system. Naomi Wolf famously argued in The Beauty Myth that modern societies could use beauty standards as a mechanism for disciplining women even as women gained greater social and political freedoms (Wolf, 1991). The crown could therefore become both a prize and a form of social control.

Race profoundly complicates the question of beauty. European colonialism established racial hierarchies that frequently associated European physical characteristics with civilization, refinement, and social superiority. These ideas did not disappear with the formal end of colonial rule. They continued through cultural institutions, advertising, entertainment, education, and social conventions. Consequently, the question “Who is beautiful?” cannot be separated from the historical question of “Whose appearance has been granted authority?”

For Black women, the politics of beauty have been particularly complicated. Features historically associated with African ancestry—dark skin, tightly coiled hair, broad noses, fuller lips, and certain body types—have frequently been stigmatized within societies influenced by Eurocentric standards. At the same time, Black women have continually created their own traditions of beauty, fashion, hair artistry, adornment, and self-definition. The history of Black beauty is therefore not simply a history of exclusion; it is also a history of resistance.

Colorism adds another dimension to this struggle. Within and across racial communities, lighter skin has sometimes been associated with greater beauty, privilege, desirability, or social status. Research on skin-tone bias has documented associations between complexion and social outcomes, including perceptions of attractiveness and social treatment (Hunter, 2005). The result is a troubling hierarchy in which Black women may be judged not simply according to whether they are considered beautiful, but according to where their complexion places them within a racialized beauty spectrum.

Hair provides another example of how beauty standards can become social expectations. Black women’s natural hair has historically been subjected to scrutiny, regulation, and discrimination. Straightened hair has sometimes been interpreted as more professional or socially acceptable than natural Afro-textured hair. The contemporary natural-hair movement has challenged this assumption by asserting that tightly coiled and textured hair does not require transformation to become legitimate. The crown, in this context, becomes symbolic: Who gets to appear as herself without modification?

The entertainment industry has also played a powerful role in determining which women receive widespread recognition for their beauty. Film studios, magazines, advertising agencies, television networks, and fashion institutions historically had disproportionate influence over which faces became internationally recognizable. When particular racial groups were underrepresented, audiences were exposed to a narrower definition of attractiveness. Representation matters because repeated visibility can influence perceptions of what is considered normal, desirable, aspirational, or beautiful.

Yet representation alone does not eliminate hierarchy. A society can increase the visibility of Black women while still rewarding particular forms of Black beauty over others. The preferred Black woman may be lighter-skinned, younger, thinner, more racially ambiguous, closer to Eurocentric facial proportions, or more commercially marketable. This produces an important distinction between representation and liberation. Being permitted into the beauty hierarchy is not necessarily the same as dismantling the hierarchy itself.

Age introduces another contradiction. Women are frequently told that beauty is timeless, yet commercial culture overwhelmingly associates feminine desirability with youth. Older women may become increasingly invisible within advertising, fashion, entertainment, and romantic narratives. Gray hair, wrinkles, changing bodies, and mature facial features are often treated as problems to conceal rather than evidence of a life lived. The older woman therefore confronts a different question: Can she possess the crown without pretending she is still young?

Class also influences beauty. Maintaining the appearance celebrated by contemporary culture can require substantial resources. Professional hairstyling, skincare, cosmetics, dental care, fashionable clothing, cosmetic procedures, fitness programs, photography, and other forms of appearance management can be expensive. Consequently, beauty standards may appear universal while being easier to achieve for people with greater economic resources. The crown can therefore conceal a financial barrier.

Social media has intensified these dynamics. Platforms built around photographs and short-form video have created unprecedented opportunities for ordinary people to participate in beauty culture, but they have also expanded exposure to filters, cosmetic editing, algorithmic recommendations, influencer marketing, and highly curated images. Research has associated social-media exposure and appearance-focused comparison with body-image concerns among some users (Fardouly & Vartanian, 2016). The contemporary beauty contest is no longer confined to a stage; it can occur every time someone opens a phone.

Algorithms introduce an additional complication because they can amplify particular forms of attractiveness. Images that generate engagement may receive greater visibility, while beauty characteristics that do not perform as well commercially can become less visible. This creates the possibility of an automated beauty hierarchy—one in which technological systems appear neutral while reproducing patterns embedded in their training data, user behavior, and commercial incentives. The crown can therefore become increasingly difficult to locate because the judges are no longer visibly sitting at a table.

Beauty pageants themselves illustrate the tension between individual achievement and institutional judgment. A contestant may possess intelligence, charisma, confidence, talent, physical beauty, and community commitment, yet the title still depends on a judging system. The winner does not become objectively more beautiful because a crown is placed on her head. Rather, she becomes the person whom a particular institution selected according to particular criteria at a particular historical moment. The crown establishes recognition, not metaphysical truth.

This distinction matters because declaring someone “the most beautiful woman in the world” sounds definitive even though beauty cannot be measured with the precision of temperature or blood pressure. Researchers can study facial symmetry, averageness, sexual dimorphism, skin quality, and other features associated with attractiveness judgments, but human attraction remains influenced by culture, familiarity, individual preference, context, and social meaning (Rhodes, 2006). Science can investigate patterns in attractiveness; it cannot legitimately appoint one woman as humanity’s objectively most beautiful person.

There is also a psychological cost to constantly ranking women. When women are encouraged to see one another as competitors for a limited supply of beauty, another woman’s attractiveness can become a threat to one’s own perceived worth. This creates a scarcity model of beauty: if she is the most beautiful, perhaps I am less beautiful. If she receives the crown, someone else must remain beneath it. Such thinking transforms beauty from a form of human appreciation into a hierarchy of female value.

The true crown comes from the Most High.

Perhaps the most important question, therefore, is whether anyone deserves the crown at all. Deserving implies that beauty is a competition in which one woman can legitimately outrank billions of others. But human beings possess radically different forms of beauty. One woman may possess extraordinary facial symmetry; another may possess striking eyes; another may have an unforgettable smile; another may become more beautiful with age; another may possess a presence that cannot be captured in a photograph. Beauty is multidimensional, and the attempt to compress it into one winner inevitably leaves something out.

For Black women, rejecting a single crown can be particularly liberating. It means that dark-skinned women do not need to prove that they can compete with lighter-skinned women; women with natural hair do not need to demonstrate that their texture can imitate another standard; older women do not need to defeat younger women; and Black women do not need institutional approval before recognizing their own beauty. The goal is not to replace one hierarchy with another but to question why beauty must function as a hierarchy at all.

This does not mean that preferences cease to exist. Human beings will continue to find particular faces, bodies, styles, and personalities attractive. Individuals are entitled to aesthetic preferences. The problem emerges when personal preference becomes institutionalized as universal truth. When one group’s preferences determine who receives social respect, romantic desirability, employment opportunities, media visibility, or cultural prestige, beauty becomes something more consequential than taste.

Perhaps, then, the crown belongs to no single woman. Or perhaps every woman has a crown that cannot be transferred to another person because beauty is not a finite resource. The woman with dark skin does not become less beautiful because another woman has lighter skin. The older woman does not become invisible because a younger woman is radiant. The woman without expensive clothing does not become less worthy because another woman can afford designer fashion. Beauty does not become smaller when it is shared.

The real crown may therefore belong to the person who refuses to surrender her humanity to the beauty hierarchy. She understands that attractiveness can be celebrated without becoming a measure of worth. She can admire another woman’s beauty without diminishing her own. She can acknowledge cultural standards without allowing them to determine her identity. And she can recognize that the most important question is not “Who is the prettiest race?” but “Who gave anyone the authority to decide?”

Ultimately, the crown is a symbol of power. Whoever controls the definition of beauty can elevate some appearances and marginalize others. That is why the beauty question deserves serious examination rather than superficial celebration. The future of beauty may not require a new winner; it may require a new understanding. Instead of asking which woman deserves to stand above all others, perhaps society should learn to recognize beauty without constructing a throne beneath it.

If this work has informed or inspired you, please consider supporting it so we can continue researching, writing, and sharing these stories.

CashApp: $thebrowngirlnetwork

References

Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. R. (2016). Social media and body image concerns: Current research and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005

Hunter, M. (2005). Race, gender, and the politics of skin tone. Routledge.

Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208

Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. William Morrow and Company.

biblical marriage, crown, King, marriage, The Marriage Series

When She Crowns Her King

Throughout history, the image of a king has represented leadership, responsibility, protection, and service. However, true kingship is not defined merely by a title, wealth, or public recognition. A genuine king is revealed through character, wisdom, humility, integrity, and the ability to serve others. When a woman chooses a partner and “crowns her king,” she is not simply selecting a companion; she is recognizing the qualities that establish a foundation for love, family, and legacy.

The concept of a woman crowning her king reflects the importance of discernment in relationships. In many cultures and traditions, women have been viewed as partners who provide wisdom, encouragement, and emotional support. The decision to unite with a man carries significant influence because relationships often shape families, communities, and future generations. A wise woman looks beyond outward appearances and considers the heart, values, faith, and responsibility of the person beside her.

Modern society often presents relationships through the lens of entertainment, popularity, wealth, and physical attraction. While attraction and compatibility are important, lasting relationships require deeper qualities. Character, emotional maturity, honesty, commitment, and shared values create the foundation upon which healthy partnerships are built. A crown placed upon someone without wisdom may honor the wrong person, but a crown placed upon a person of integrity recognizes true worth.

Biblical teachings frequently use the imagery of kingship to describe leadership and responsibility. Scripture emphasizes that those given authority must use it with righteousness, humility, and compassion. A king is not called to dominate but to serve. In the same way, a husband or partner is called to demonstrate love, sacrifice, protection, and responsibility within the relationship (Ephesians 5:25).

The wisdom of a woman is also emphasized throughout biblical literature. Proverbs 31 describes a woman of strength, wisdom, dignity, and excellence who contributes greatly to her household and community. Her value is not based only on appearance but on her character, intelligence, work ethic, and ability to build. This passage illustrates that a woman who crowns a king must also recognize her own worth and purpose.

Historically, strong societies have often been built through partnerships between men and women who shared vision and responsibility. Queens throughout history were not merely decorative figures; many influenced politics, culture, education, and social development. Their leadership demonstrates that a woman’s role beside a king can involve wisdom, strategy, courage, and influence.

The phrase “when she crowns her king” also raises important questions about expectations placed on both men and women. A woman should not be expected to rescue, rebuild, or transform someone who refuses growth. A crown represents honor, but honor must be earned through consistent actions. A healthy relationship requires two individuals who are committed to personal development and mutual respect.

In contemporary discussions about love and marriage, there is increasing recognition that emotional intelligence and character are essential qualities in a partner. A man who understands responsibility, communicates effectively, respects women, and values family demonstrates the qualities of leadership needed for a strong relationship. Likewise, a woman who understands her worth brings wisdom, strength, and partnership into the union.

A woman’s choice of a partner can influence generations beyond her own lifetime. Families often inherit patterns of communication, love, conflict resolution, and values from previous generations. Therefore, choosing a partner is not only a personal decision but also one that can affect children, communities, and future legacies. Wisdom in relationships becomes a form of generational stewardship.

Ultimately, when she crowns her king, she is not creating his value—she is recognizing the value already demonstrated through his character. A true king does not require a crown to prove his worth; his actions reveal who he is. The greatest relationships are built when two people honor each other, grow together, and pursue a purpose greater than themselves.

References

Collins, P. H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.

hooks, b. (2000). All About Love: New Visions. William Morrow.

Proverbs 31:10–31. The Holy Bible, King James Version.

Ephesians 5:21–33. The Holy Bible, King James Version.

Wright, H. N. (2012). The Premarital Counseling Handbook. Moody Publishers.