The belief that white women represented the highest standard of feminine beauty did not emerge from an objective measurement of human attractiveness. It developed within a much larger historical system in which European societies possessed expanding political, economic, military, and cultural power. As European colonialism spread across the world, European ideas about race, civilization, femininity, respectability, and physical appearance were increasingly positioned as authoritative. Beauty consequently became intertwined with power. What was repeatedly represented as beautiful could eventually appear natural, universal, and self-evident, even when those standards reflected particular historical circumstances.
The racialization of physical appearance became especially significant during the development of European colonial societies and the Atlantic slave system. Historians have demonstrated that colonists increasingly used physical characteristics to classify human beings and to construct racial categories. Skin complexion, hair, facial characteristics, ancestry, and other bodily distinctions were transformed from ordinary human variation into social markers associated with status and identity. Sharon Block’s research demonstrates that eighteenth-century Anglo-Americans participated in creating racial ideologies by repeatedly describing bodies and physical characteristics in ways that transformed variation into racial meaning.
Slavery intensified these distinctions because the institution required an ideological justification for treating human beings as property. Enslaved Africans and their descendants had to be represented as fundamentally different from the people who claimed ownership over them. Race therefore became more than a description of appearance. It became a social system that determined legal status, labor, inheritance, citizenship, freedom, and human value. Jennifer Morgan’s research demonstrates how enslaved African women became central to the development of racial slavery because their labor and reproductive lives were appropriated by slaveholders and incorporated into the economic and legal structure of slavery.
Within that system, white womanhood acquired a particular symbolic significance. White women occupied a subordinated position within patriarchal society, but their racial identity nevertheless placed them within the dominant racial category. Cecily Jones’s historical examination of Barbados and North Carolina shows how whiteness shaped white women’s social identities and material circumstances during slavery. White women were also understood as biological and cultural reproducers of whiteness, making their bodies important to the maintenance of racial boundaries.
This distinction is essential because the historical elevation of white femininity cannot be understood simply as a matter of individual attraction. White womanhood became associated with a particular social order. The white woman could be represented as respectable, protected, domestic, civilized, sexually controlled, and worthy of social protection, while Black women were subjected to radically different assumptions. Race and gender therefore operated together to create contrasting models of femininity.
Enslaved Black women were not merely excluded from the dominant ideal of womanhood; they were frequently denied the protections associated with respectable femininity altogether. Their forced labor, reproductive exploitation, and vulnerability to sexual violence contradicted the image of the protected white woman. Scholars of slavery have therefore emphasized that Black women’s bodies became important sites upon which racial and gender ideology was constructed. Deborah Gray White’s work, for example, demonstrated how stereotypes surrounding enslaved Black women helped distinguish them from the idealized image of white womanhood.
The distinction between white and Black womanhood consequently had aesthetic consequences. If whiteness was associated with civilization, refinement, respectability, freedom, and social authority, physical characteristics associated with whiteness could acquire symbolic value as well. Beauty did not exist outside this system. The appearance of the privileged group could become associated with the privileges of the group itself. Physical appearance therefore became one mechanism through which social hierarchy could be made visible.
The development of Western art also contributed to the cultural authority of whiteness. European artistic traditions repeatedly centered European bodies and faces as subjects of idealized representation. Nineteenth-century neoclassical sculpture provides a particularly revealing example. Scholarship on Black female representation in nineteenth-century American art demonstrates how white marble became associated with prestigious Western artistic traditions and how Black female bodies were frequently marginalized, transformed, or represented through racialized assumptions.
This does not mean that Europeans invented the human appreciation of beauty. Human beings in African societies, Asian societies, Indigenous societies, Middle Eastern societies, and European societies all possessed aesthetic traditions long before modern racial classifications. Nor does it mean that every European person believed white women were more beautiful than everyone else. The historically significant development was the increasing ability of European powers to make particular European standards disproportionately influential across societies.
Colonialism expanded this influence dramatically. European powers controlled territories, economies, educational systems, religious institutions, publishing networks, and political structures across much of the world. As European institutions became dominant, European cultural preferences could be presented as sophisticated, modern, civilized, or desirable. Beauty standards could therefore travel alongside political and economic power.
The process continued after formal emancipation. The abolition of slavery did not immediately eliminate the racial hierarchy that slavery had created and reinforced. In the United States, segregation, racial violence, discriminatory employment practices, unequal education, and exclusion from political and economic institutions continued to define the lives of Black Americans. Beauty culture developed within this environment rather than outside it.
The twentieth-century beauty industry demonstrates how these historical relationships could become commercialized. Blain Roberts’s research on beauty culture in the American South shows that cosmetics, clothing, hairdressing, beauty contests, and other practices were deeply connected to racial divisions. During the Jim Crow era, parts of the cosmetics industry promoted products and practices that emphasized whiteness, while Black-owned beauty establishments subsequently became important spaces for community building and resistance.
Black women were therefore not passive recipients of European beauty standards. They created their own beauty institutions, businesses, magazines, pageants, hairstyles, cosmetics, and cultural movements. Tiffany Gill’s work on Black beauty culture, along with Cheryl Thompson’s scholarship on Black hair and beauty, illustrates the ways African American women used beauty practices to construct identity, economic independence, dignity, and community. The history of Black beauty is consequently not simply a history of oppression; it is also a history of creativity, entrepreneurship, resistance, and self-definition.
Madam C. J. Walker provides one of the most recognizable examples. Her beauty enterprise became an important part of Black economic history and demonstrated that Black women could create businesses specifically designed for Black consumers. Yet the products and advertising of the period also existed within a society in which European characteristics frequently carried greater social prestige. Scholars therefore caution against reducing Black beauty culture to either complete resistance or complete assimilation. The relationship was much more complicated.
This complexity matters because racialized beauty hierarchies could be reproduced within Black communities without meaning that Black people independently invented the original racial hierarchy. People living within a society inevitably encounter its definitions of status and desirability. Individuals can internalize, reinterpret, reject, modify, or reproduce cultural standards that existed before them. Consequently, the presence of preferences for particular skin tones, hair textures, facial characteristics, or body types among Black people does not erase the historical circumstances in which racial meanings were created.
The psychological dimension of this process is particularly important. Repetition creates familiarity. When television, magazines, advertising, cinema, fashion, beauty contests, textbooks, artwork, and popular culture repeatedly place one physical type at the center of beauty, audiences can begin to perceive that type as the conventional image of attractiveness. The standard then becomes self-reinforcing. Representation influences perception, perception influences consumer behavior, and consumer behavior can encourage industries to continue producing the same forms of representation.
The history of Black women in American beauty culture illustrates this tension particularly well. Black women simultaneously confronted exclusion from mainstream beauty institutions and built alternative institutions of their own. Walker’s research on African American beauty culture demonstrates that Black beauty standards were shaped within Black communities as well as in reaction to the broader white-dominated society. This is important because it prevents the history from becoming overly simplistic. Black women possessed agency even while operating within a racialized cultural environment.
The Civil Rights and Black Power eras produced especially powerful challenges to racialized beauty hierarchies. Black women increasingly embraced natural hair, African-inspired aesthetics, Black-owned beauty businesses, and public representations that rejected the assumption that European physical characteristics were prerequisites for beauty. Beauty became political because appearance could communicate racial pride, resistance, self-determination, and rejection of imposed standards. Roberts’s research documents the ways beauty contests and Black beauty institutions became arenas in which racial identity and political meaning were contested.
The historical record therefore challenges the proposition that white women were simply “always” considered the most beautiful. What existed was a powerful system in which whiteness became associated with social authority and, consequently, could become associated with desirable physical appearance. These associations were constructed through centuries of colonial expansion, slavery, racial classification, segregation, economic power, cultural production, and institutional representation. They were historically produced rather than biologically ordained.
At the same time, contemporary beauty cannot be reduced entirely to historical oppression. People possess individual preferences, different cultures maintain distinctive aesthetic traditions, and standards continue to evolve. Black women themselves have profoundly influenced global fashion, entertainment, cosmetics, modeling, music, and popular culture. Contemporary representations of Black beauty demonstrate that aesthetic authority can be challenged and redistributed. The increasing visibility of dark-skinned women, natural hair, African features, diverse body types, and multiple forms of Black femininity illustrates the continuing transformation of the beauty landscape.
Ultimately, the history of racialized beauty hierarchies is a history of power over perception. European colonialism and racial slavery helped construct social meanings around bodies that extended far beyond physical appearance. Whiteness became connected to privilege, while Blackness was systematically devalued. Those associations could eventually migrate into definitions of beauty, femininity, respectability, and desirability. Understanding that history does not require declaring one group naturally beautiful and another naturally unattractive. Instead, it allows us to ask a more profound question: who possessed the power to define beauty, whose image was repeatedly displayed as its embodiment, and whose humanity was systematically denied recognition?
The liberation of beauty therefore requires more than replacing one racial hierarchy with another. It requires recognizing that human beauty is extraordinarily diverse and that no single population possesses a biological monopoly on attractiveness. Black women do not need permission from history to be beautiful. Their beauty existed before European colonialism, before American slavery, before Hollywood, before fashion magazines, and before Western institutions had the power to determine which faces and bodies would receive cultural admiration. The historical task is not to prove that Black women can meet someone else’s standard of beauty. It is to understand how standards themselves were constructed—and to recognize the humanity, dignity, individuality, and aesthetic diversity that those standards have often obscured.
Love what we do? Help us continue the work.
Your donation helps support independent content, meaningful storytelling, education, representation, and the continued growth of The Brown Girl Dilemma. Every contribution makes a difference.
Thank you for supporting the vision.
CashApp: https://cash.app/$thebrowngirlnetwork
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
References
Block, S. (2018). Colonial complexions: Race and bodies in eighteenth-century America. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gill, T. M. (2010). Beauty shop politics: African American women’s activism in the beauty industry. University of Illinois Press.
Jones, C. (2007). Engendering whiteness: White women and colonialism in Barbados and North Carolina, 1627–1865. Manchester University Press.
Morgan, J. L. (2021). Reckoning with slavery: Gender, kinship, and capitalism in the early Black Atlantic. Duke University Press.
Roberts, B. (2014). Pageants, parlors, and pretty women: Race and beauty in the twentieth-century South. University of North Carolina Press.
Strings, S. (2019). Fearing the Black body: The racial origins of fat phobia. New York University Press.
Walker, S. S. (2007). Style and status: Selling beauty to African American women, 1920–1975. University Press of Kentucky.
White, D. G. (1999). Let my people go: African Americans, 1800–1860. Oxford University Press.
White, D. G. (2019). Ar’n’t I a woman?: Female slaves in the plantation South (Rev. ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Young, H. (2009). The color of stone: Sculpting the Black female subject in nineteenth-century America. University of Minnesota Press.
