Category Archives: Beauty Addictions

Beware of Fine Black Men

Don’t get me wrong, ladies—there is nothing wrong with appreciating the extraordinary beauty of a Black man. Black male beauty can be breathtaking: the strength of his features, the richness of his complexion, the shape of his face, his eyes, smile, stature, and masculine presence can be genuinely captivating. I can speak about this appreciation personally because my late husband was one of the finest men ever. His beauty was something I cherished, but what made him meaningful to me was far greater than his appearance was his love for God and me. There is a profound difference between admiring a beautiful man and entrusting your heart, body, and future to him.

Black men are masculine perfection and can embody a remarkable expression of masculine beauty and presence. There is something powerful about seeing masculinity expressed through different complexions, facial structures, hair textures, physiques, personalities, and styles. Black male beauty does not have to be minimized in order to discuss discernment. We can celebrate the beauty of Black men while simultaneously reminding women that a beautiful exterior does not automatically reveal the condition of a man’s heart. The two conversations can exist together: Black male beauty deserves appreciation, but Black male character deserves examination.

A handsome man can make a woman’s heart skip a beat, but he cannot be selected as a husband simply because he is physically irresistible. His face cannot tell her whether he will be faithful. His physique cannot tell her whether he will be responsible. His smile cannot tell her whether he will protect her heart. His eyes cannot tell her whether he fears God. His charisma cannot tell her whether he possesses self-control. These things must be demonstrated over time. Physical attraction may introduce a woman to a man, but his character should determine whether she allows the relationship to progress toward something deeper.

That is why women should never confuse masculine beauty with masculine maturity. A man can look exceptionally masculine while lacking discipline, responsibility, integrity, or emotional maturity. Conversely, a man may become even more attractive as his character is revealed. His kindness can make his smile more beautiful. His wisdom can make his presence more compelling. His faithfulness can make his face more familiar and precious. His ability to keep his word can create a kind of attraction that physical beauty alone cannot manufacture. There is a beauty that the eye sees and another beauty that the heart discovers.

So, ladies, appreciate the handsome Black man. Admire his beautiful features. Appreciate his complexion, his stature, his style, his smile, and yes—even those captivating eyes. 😂 But do not let beautiful eyes make decisions that your wisdom should be making. Those “bedroom eyes” can be powerful, but a seductive look is not a marriage covenant. Attraction can be intense, but intensity is not necessarily intimacy, and chemistry is not character.

Before you take a handsome man into your bedroom, make sure that he is your husband in marriage and take the time to discover who he is outside of it. Before marriage –Does he honor God? Does he respect your boundaries? Is he responsible? Does he work toward something meaningful? Does he keep his promises? How does he treat people who cannot benefit him? Can he apologize? Can he control himself? Does he demonstrate genuine compassion? Does he desire marriage, or does he simply desire access to your body? These questions may not be as exciting as staring into his eyes, but they can be far more consequential.

A godly man should therefore be evaluated by the fruit of his life rather than the perfection of his appearance. Scripture says, “Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised” (Proverbs 31:30, KJV). That does not mean beauty is worthless; it means beauty is temporary and insufficient as the foundation for a lifelong covenant. A woman can appreciate a man’s beauty while requiring something much deeper from the man who wants her heart.

My late husband being one of the finest men I have ever known reminds me that these qualities do not have to compete. A man can be extraordinarily handsome and possess beautiful character. He can be masculine, gentle, and love the Most High. He can be physically attractive and spiritually grounded. He can have bedroom eyes and enough self-control to respect the woman standing before him. The goal is not to reject masculine beauty but to refuse to allow beauty to blind us to everything else that matters.

Ultimately, ladies, enjoy the beauty—but investigate the man. ❤️ A handsome Black man can be absolutely breathtaking, and there is nothing wrong with acknowledging that. But when you’re deciding whether he deserves access to your body, your heart, your home, or your future, look beyond the face. Look at his faith. Look at his integrity. Look at his responsibility. Look at his personality. Look at his treatment of others. Look at his willingness to wait, his ability to provide and contribute, and his commitment to something greater than himself. The finest man is not merely the one who looks good standing beside you; he is the one whose character makes you grateful that you chose him.

Physical beauty can be captivating, and there is nothing wrong with appreciating a handsome man. A woman may notice his face, smile, physique, style, voice, or the way his eyes meet hers across a room. Yet attraction should never be confused with character. A beautiful exterior cannot tell a woman whether a man is honest, faithful, responsible, compassionate, disciplined, emotionally mature, or committed to God. Scripture reminds us, “Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised” (Proverbs 31:30, KJV). A handsome Black man can certainly possess excellent character, but his appearance alone cannot establish that character. A woman should therefore appreciate beauty without allowing beauty to become the primary qualification for choosing a husband.

The culture of “pretty boy perfection” can create an illusion that the most attractive man must also be the most desirable partner. Social media, entertainment, advertising, and popular culture frequently place extraordinary emphasis on physical appearance, grooming, clothing, physique, and sexual appeal. However, perfection in appearance is not perfection in character. A man can have a beautiful face and an undisciplined life. He can have a remarkable body and an unfaithful heart. He can dress impeccably while treating people poorly. He can possess the kind of “bedroom eyes” that make a woman feel immediately desired while having no intention of offering her commitment, protection, stability, or marriage. Beauty may open the door to attraction, but it cannot establish what is happening behind the door of a man’s heart.

The things that matter most in a man are often less visible than his physical appearance. A woman’s attention should eventually move beyond his face and toward his conduct. How does he treat his mother, children, elders, strangers, coworkers, and people who cannot do anything for him? Does he keep his word? Does he accept responsibility when he is wrong? Does he control himself when he is angry? Does he respect boundaries? Is he hardworking? Is he compassionate? Can he communicate honestly? Does he possess humility? These qualities are far more revealing of someone’s suitability for marriage than a handsome face. First Samuel 16:7 teaches that while people look at outward appearance, the LORD looks at the heart. Character is not as immediately visible as beauty, but it becomes visible through consistent behavior.

For a woman seeking a husband according to biblical principles, a godly man should receive serious consideration. This does not mean that every man who uses religious language is automatically godly. A man’s conduct must correspond with his profession of faith. Jesus taught that a tree is known by its fruit (Matthew 7:16–20). A genuinely God-centered man should demonstrate his faith through his behavior, not merely through church attendance, Bible quotations, religious titles, or public declarations. Galatians 5:22–23 describes qualities such as love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, and temperance. These characteristics may not produce the immediate visual excitement of physical attraction, but they can become enormously important in the realities of marriage.

One particularly meaningful sign of self-control is a man who respects sexual boundaries and is willing to wait for marriage. In a culture where sexual access can be treated as an expectation of dating, a man who sincerely refuses to pressure a woman into sex demonstrates that he understands that her body is not something to which he is automatically entitled. First Corinthians 6:18 instructs believers to “flee fornication,” while Hebrews 13:4 teaches that marriage is honorable and that the marriage bed is to be kept pure. A man who tells a woman that he wants to honor God and honor her by waiting until marriage is communicating something substantially different from a man whose primary objective is physical gratification. His willingness to exercise restraint can reveal more about his character than his appearance ever could.

Women should therefore be careful when a man’s physical attraction becomes so powerful that it overrides discernment. There is nothing wrong with noticing beautiful eyes, a handsome smile, a strong physique, or an appealing presence. The danger comes when those qualities become intoxicating enough to silence important questions. “Bedroom eyes” can communicate desire, but desire is not commitment. A seductive look can make a woman feel beautiful, wanted, and emotionally connected within seconds, but a look cannot pay a bill, keep a promise, raise a child, resolve conflict, or remain faithful during difficult seasons. Before allowing chemistry to lead her toward the bedroom, a woman should ask whether the man has demonstrated the qualities necessary for a lifelong covenant.

A handsome man who is not a provider—or who refuses responsibility—does not become an adequate husband merely because he is attractive. Provision should not be reduced to money alone, because a healthy marriage involves many forms of contribution: financial responsibility, emotional support, protection, service, wisdom, encouragement, labor, and commitment. Nevertheless, a man who deliberately avoids responsibility while expecting a woman to carry the burdens of the relationship is presenting a serious character issue. Scripture speaks repeatedly about responsibility toward one’s household. First Timothy 5:8 states that a person who fails to provide for his own, particularly his household, has neglected an important responsibility. A woman’s standards should therefore include character, responsibility, work ethic, generosity, and willingness to build—not simply physical beauty.

Personality matters as well. A beautiful man who is narcissistic, arrogant, disrespectful, selfish, dishonest, controlling, emotionally unavailable, or cruel can turn physical attraction into emotional exhaustion. Conversely, a man who possesses integrity, humor, kindness, wisdom, patience, humility, and emotional maturity can become increasingly attractive as a woman gets to know him. This is one reason relationships should be given enough time for character to reveal itself. Attraction can happen instantly; trust cannot. A photograph can reveal a face; time reveals a life. A dating relationship should therefore provide opportunities to observe how a man handles disappointment, disagreement, temptation, responsibility, money, family, boundaries, and adversity.

This message is not an indictment of handsome Black men. Black men, like men of every racial background, possess tremendous diversity in appearance and character. The point is that Black beauty should not be mistaken for Black character. A woman should not reject a good man because he is handsome, nor should she choose a man because he is handsome. The issue is misplaced priorities. Physical attraction has a legitimate place in romantic relationships, but it should exist alongside discernment rather than replace it. A woman can admire a man’s beauty while asking much deeper questions about his values, faith, conduct, intentions, responsibility, and treatment of others. Beauty may attract her attention, but character should help determine whether she continues giving him access to her heart and life.

Ultimately, the finest man is not necessarily the man who turns the most heads when he walks into a room. The finest man may be the one whose private character matches his public appearance; whose faith influences his decisions; whose word can be trusted; whose self-control protects rather than pressures; whose love is demonstrated through action; and whose intentions are directed toward honorable commitment. Proverbs 20:11 teaches that even a child is known by his doings, while Micah 6:8 calls people to walk humbly with God and to practice justice and mercy. A woman should never allow a handsome face, seductive eyes, impressive physique, expensive clothing, or charismatic personality to rush her into sexual intimacy before marriage and has examined the man’s character to make sure is it Godly. Do not let his looks lead you to the bedroom before his character has earned a place in your life. The face may be fine, but the heart, faith, integrity, responsibility, and actions are what ultimately matter. Seek God first.

Love what we do? Help us continue the work.
Your donation helps support independent content, meaningful storytelling, education, representation, and the continued growth of The Brown Girl Dilemma. Every contribution makes a difference.

Thank you for supporting the vision. 

CashApp: https://cash.app/$thebrowngirlnetwork

References

The Holy Bible, King James Version. (1611/1769). Proverbs 20:11; Proverbs 31:30; Matthew 7:16–20; 1 Corinthians 6:18; Galatians 5:22–23; 1 Timothy 5:8; Hebrews 13:4; Micah 6:8; 1 Samuel 16:7.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–49.

Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290.

Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304–341.

Beauty Addictions

Beauty is one of humanity’s oldest fascinations, but in contemporary society beauty has become more than an aesthetic preference. It can become a measure of worth, desirability, femininity, social status, youth, success, and even identity. The modern beauty industry does not merely sell lipstick, skincare, hair products, clothing, cosmetic procedures, and fragrances; it also participates in selling ideas about who we should become. This raises an uncomfortable but important question: Why do we become obsessed with being beautiful?

The desire to be attractive is not inherently unhealthy. Human beings naturally notice faces, bodies, grooming, symmetry, skin condition, and other visual characteristics. Research on facial attractiveness has identified factors such as averageness, symmetry, femininity or masculinity, and visible skin characteristics as influences on attractiveness judgments. Yet attractiveness is never determined by biology alone. Culture, familiarity, experience, media, social learning, personality, and individual preferences all contribute to what people perceive as beautiful.

The distinction between appreciating beauty and becoming psychologically dependent upon it is therefore essential. Appreciation allows beauty to be enjoyed without becoming the foundation of identity. Fixation is different. Fixation occurs when appearance begins to consume disproportionate attention, when imperfections become intolerable, or when self-worth becomes dependent upon being perceived as attractive. A woman can enjoy fashion, makeup, skincare, beautiful hair, jewelry, or an elegant dress without believing that she has no value without them. The problem begins when beauty ceases to be something she possesses or expresses and becomes something she believes she must constantly prove.

Beauty can become addictive because it offers immediate psychological rewards. A new hairstyle can produce excitement. Makeup can create confidence. Compliments can provide social validation. A beautiful photograph can generate admiration. A luxury product can create feelings of accomplishment. These experiences can reinforce repeated investment in appearance. Research on makeup, for example, has found that women in one experimental study rated themselves as more feminine, healthier, and higher in self-esteem after simulated makeup application than when they were without it.

This helps explain why some women feel invisible without makeup. Makeup can become more than cosmetics; it can become a psychological costume through which a woman feels prepared to enter the world. If compliments, romantic attention, professional treatment, or social approval consistently follow an enhanced appearance, the mind can begin associating beauty practices with safety and acceptance. Eventually, the woman may not simply think, “I look better with makeup.” She may begin thinking, “People will not see me if I do not wear it.” Those are profoundly different beliefs.

The danger is not makeup itself. The danger is the belief that one’s unaltered face is inadequate. Cosmetics can be creative, pleasurable, culturally meaningful, and empowering. A woman may wear makeup because she enjoys artistry or because it expresses her personal style. But when removing the makeup produces shame, panic, avoidance, or a profound sense of worthlessness, the issue has moved beyond cosmetics into the psychology of self-perception. The question becomes whether the woman is using beauty or whether beauty has begun using her.

Another source of beauty obsession is comparison. Women do not evaluate themselves in isolation. They evaluate themselves beside other women, alongside photographs, beside celebrities, against friends, against former versions of themselves, and increasingly against algorithmically selected images of strangers. Social comparison theory helps explain why another person’s beauty can become psychologically relevant to one’s own self-evaluation. A woman may see another woman’s face and admire it, but admiration can quickly become comparison: Her skin is clearer than mine. Her body is better than mine. Her hair is longer. Her features are more symmetrical. Men probably prefer her.

This comparison becomes particularly powerful because beauty is socially visible. Academic achievement may not be immediately observable. Kindness may take time to discover. Wisdom is not always visible in a photograph. Beauty, however, can be evaluated in seconds. In a culture dominated by images, appearance can therefore become a highly competitive form of social currency. Research has repeatedly associated appearance comparison through social media with poorer body-image outcomes, and a 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis involving 83 studies and more than 55,000 participants found a significant association between greater online social comparison and greater body-image concerns.

Social media intensifies this phenomenon because it transforms ordinary comparison into a continuous visual environment. Women are no longer comparing themselves only with the women they encounter in everyday life. They can compare themselves with thousands of carefully selected images every day. Filters, professional lighting, cosmetic procedures, posing, editing, makeup, hair extensions, curated wardrobes, and selective posting can make the comparison even more distorted. Experimental evidence has found that exposure to appearance-ideal social-media imagery can negatively affect body image, while more recent evidence continues to identify appearance-focused social-media engagement as an important factor in appearance comparison and internalization of ideals.

The algorithm adds another dimension to the problem because it learns what captures attention. If a woman repeatedly watches beauty transformations, cosmetic procedures, luxury skincare, celebrity photographs, weight-loss content, or facial-analysis videos, the platform can continue presenting similar material. Beauty therefore becomes not only something she thinks about but something the digital environment repeatedly places before her. The result can be an endless psychological loop: observe, compare, feel inadequate, modify, receive validation, observe again, compare again.

Women also compare themselves because beauty can influence social treatment. Attractive people may receive attention, compliments, romantic interest, and other forms of positive social response. Research on facial attractiveness has shown that appearance can influence important social judgments and interactions, including relationship choices and other interpersonal decisions. This means that the desire to be beautiful is not necessarily superficial. Sometimes women have learned through experience that appearance changes how they are treated.

The problem becomes more complicated for Black women because beauty has historically been entangled with race. Beauty standards have frequently privileged Eurocentric characteristics, including lighter skin, straight hair, and narrow facial features, while devaluing characteristics associated with Blackness. Contemporary research with Black women continues to document the psychological consequences of racialized beauty standards and the ways that skin tone, hair texture, and body shape can become sources of appearance-based judgment.

Colorism is therefore not merely a disagreement about shades of skin. It is a social hierarchy in which skin tone can influence perceptions of beauty, desirability, status, and belonging. Recent research examining Black and mixed Black-White women found that colorist appearance ideals can shape desirability hierarchies and relationships, while participants described mainstream media as contributing to the privileging of lighter skin and Eurocentric appearance characteristics. For dark-skinned Black women in particular, the pressure can become psychologically exhausting because they are sometimes asked to achieve beauty standards that were constructed without their features in mind.

This is why Black women’s beauty cannot be discussed adequately without discussing representation. When the media repeatedly presents one narrow version of what a beautiful Black woman looks like, women may unconsciously begin treating that version as the standard against which everyone else should be measured. The consequence is not simply that some women are excluded from beauty. It is that women may begin competing against one another according to a hierarchy created outside of themselves. Research on Black women’s body image has specifically identified the effects of racialized beauty aesthetics and the stigmatization of Black women according to characteristics such as skin tone, hair texture, and body shape.

Luxury beauty adds another psychological layer because beauty can become associated with status. A luxury handbag, fragrance, skincare product, designer garment, or exclusive cosmetic treatment can communicate more than aesthetic preference. It can communicate wealth, taste, exclusivity, achievement, and belonging. Research on luxury consumption has found that conspicuous luxury can function as a costly signal of wealth and status and can influence social treatment. Thus, purchasing a luxury beauty product may provide emotional gratification partly because the consumer is purchasing a symbol of who she believes she is—or wants others to believe she is.

This creates the luxury beauty dilemma. A woman may genuinely love beautiful things while simultaneously being vulnerable to the belief that expensive things make her more valuable. There is nothing inherently wrong with enjoying luxury. The danger lies in allowing the price tag to determine self-esteem. When beauty products become status symbols, the woman can become trapped in an escalating cycle in which yesterday’s luxury becomes today’s ordinary purchase and tomorrow’s product must be more exclusive, more expensive, or more difficult to obtain.

At its deepest level, beauty obsession can become a form of self-worship. This does not mean that every woman who enjoys beauty is narcissistic or vain. Rather, self-worship occurs when the self becomes the central object of attention, admiration, preservation, and devotion. Beauty can become spiritually dangerous when appearance receives more attention than character, when external admiration becomes more important than moral development, or when preserving one’s image becomes an overriding life purpose. The mirror can then become an altar, and admiration can become a form of psychological nourishment.

The contemporary obsession with photographs makes this especially complicated. The woman is no longer merely looking at herself in a mirror; she can repeatedly photograph herself, edit herself, examine herself, compare herself, post herself, and monitor other people’s reactions to herself. Her face becomes an ongoing project. Every photograph can become a test. Every comment can become a judgment. Every lack of engagement can feel like rejection. Beauty can therefore become measurable through likes, views, comments, followers, and attention.

Yet there is a profound difference between self-care and self-worship. Self-care recognizes that the body deserves stewardship, cleanliness, nourishment, rest, grooming, and respect. Self-worship turns the body into the primary source of identity and validation. Self-care says, “I value myself.” Self-worship says, “I must be admired.” That distinction deserves serious consideration because a society that constantly rewards appearance can make excessive self-focus appear normal.

The obsession becomes particularly painful when aging begins to challenge a woman’s established identity. If a woman has spent decades receiving social reinforcement primarily because she is considered beautiful, aging can feel like the loss of a social currency. Wrinkles, gray hair, changes in facial structure, alterations in body composition, and other normal signs of aging may therefore be interpreted not simply as biological changes but as threats to identity. Research with women over fifty has documented the complicated relationship among aging, body image, identity, appearance pressure, and the desire to remain socially visible.

Younger woman comforting older woman wiping tears in a bathroom mirror

Aging can also expose how deeply society has linked women’s value to youth. Cultural research has described the pressure placed upon women to remain youthful, thin, attractive, and physically polished even as they grow older. Some women experience increasing acceptance of their bodies and greater appreciation for health and function, while others continue to experience appearance anxiety and pressure to resist visible aging. This contradiction demonstrates that aging itself is not the only problem. The social meaning assigned to aging is part of the problem.

For a woman whose identity has been built heavily around beauty, aging can therefore feel like an existential crisis. She may ask, Who am I if I am no longer the most beautiful woman in the room? Who am I if men no longer look at me the same way? Who am I if my photographs no longer receive the same attention? Who am I if the face I recognize in the mirror is changing? These questions reveal that the real issue was never merely beauty. The issue was identity.

There is another way to approach beauty: to understand it as one dimension of womanhood rather than the definition of womanhood. A woman can be beautiful and intelligent. Beautiful and spiritual. Beautiful and compassionate. Beautiful and ambitious. Beautiful and humorous. Beautiful and resilient. Beautiful and aging. Beautiful and imperfect. Beauty does not have to compete with substance, but society often encourages women to treat appearance as though it were their most important credential.

The healthiest relationship with beauty may therefore be neither rejection nor obsession. Women do not need to pretend that appearance does not matter. Beauty matters culturally, socially, psychologically, artistically, and sometimes biologically. But beauty becomes healthier when it is placed within a larger hierarchy of human worth. Character, intellect, integrity, relationships, spirituality, creativity, courage, generosity, and purpose should not become invisible simply because a face is attractive.

For Black women, reclaiming beauty can also mean refusing the false choice between assimilation and invisibility. Black beauty does not have to become beautiful only when it approximates someone else’s features. Dark skin does not require apology. Natural hair does not require justification. Full lips do not need European approval. Curves do not need to be explained. A Black woman can participate in beauty culture while simultaneously challenging the racial hierarchy that has historically determined which Black women receive recognition as beautiful. Research on Black women’s body image and colorism supports the importance of understanding these experiences within their racialized and gendered context.

Beauty also becomes healthier when women stop treating other women’s beauty as evidence of their own inadequacy. Another woman’s beauty is not an accusation. Her clear skin does not make yours inferior. Her long hair does not diminish your hair. Her hourglass figure does not invalidate your body. Her youthful face does not erase your maturity. Her designer wardrobe does not reduce your accomplishments. Comparison converts another woman’s beauty into a threat; appreciation allows it to remain what it is—another expression of human variation.

The deepest liberation may occur when a woman can look in the mirror without conducting an interrogation. She can see the face that has survived childhood, adulthood, heartbreak, achievement, motherhood, widowhood, illness, joy, disappointment, and time. She can apply makeup because she enjoys it or leave it off because she chooses simplicity. She can purchase luxury because she appreciates craftsmanship without believing luxury makes her superior. She can photograph herself without needing strangers to validate her existence. She can age without believing that aging has made her disappear.

Beauty should be enjoyed, cultivated, studied, photographed, celebrated, and even indulged in moderation—but it should never become the master of the woman who possesses it. The real question behind Beauty Addictions is therefore not whether women should care about being beautiful. It is whether beauty has been given a place in their lives that belongs to something much greater. When appreciation becomes fixation, comparison becomes identity, luxury becomes status, makeup becomes a mask, social media becomes a mirror, colorism becomes a hierarchy, and aging becomes a threat, beauty has ceased to be merely beautiful. It has become a psychological authority.

The goal, then, is not to destroy the love of beauty but to restore its proper proportion. A woman should be able to admire her reflection without worshiping it, improve her appearance without despising her natural self, appreciate another woman’s beauty without competing against her, enjoy luxury without measuring her worth by it, and grow older without believing that her most valuable years have passed. The most beautiful woman may ultimately be the woman who understands that beauty is part of who she is—but never the entirety of who she is.

References

Baudouin, J.-Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002

Bonfanti, R. C., Melchiori, F., Teti, A., Albano, G., Raffard, S., Rodgers, R., & Lo Coco, G. (2025). The association between social comparison in social media, body image concerns and eating disorder symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Body Image, 52, 101841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101841

Cohen, R., Newton-John, T., & Slater, A. (2018). The relationship between social networking site use and the internalization of a thin ideal in females: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00561

Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233

Johnston, O., Reilly, J., & Kremer, J. (2004). Women’s experiences of appearance concern and body control across the lifespan: Challenging accepted wisdom. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(3), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105304042349

Lir, S. A., & Ayalon, L. (2024). Beauty work or beauty care? Women’s perceptions of appearance in the second half of life. Journal of Women & Aging, 36(3), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2024.2321668

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404

Ooi, W. L., Nasser, H., Simmons, J., & Krug, I. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the temporal relationship between appearance comparisons and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 53, 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101885

Phoenix, A., & Craddock, N. (2024). Skin shade and relationships: How colourism pits Black and mixed Black-White women against each other. Frontiers in Sociology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1495048

Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Palermo, R., Simmons, L. W., Peters, M., Lee, K., Halberstadt, J., & Crawford, J. R. (2007). Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism. Perception, 36(8), 1244–1252. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5712

Roberts, T.-A., & others. (2021). “Pretty hurts”: Acceptance of hegemonic feminine beauty ideals and reduced sexual well-being among Black women. Psychology of Women Quarterly.

Wang, H., Alivi, M. A. B., & Mustafa, S. E. B. (2025). Unveiling the relationship between social media and self-objectification: A three-level meta-analysis. Body Image. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101895

Williams, T. R., Davis, B. L., Jones, P., Muwele, C., Simpson, I., & Mashburn, R. (2024). Controlling images and standards of beauty shapes body image: Using a relational cultural approach to improve Black American women’s well-being. Ethnicity & Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2378320