black history, the brown girl dilemma

Black History: Serving our enemies.

Photo by Luis Araujo on Pexels.com

The Forgotten People: Rediscovering the Truth of Our Origins and Identity while serving our enemies.

Throughout history, the descendants of the transatlantic slave trade—commonly referred to today as African Americans, Negroes, or “Black” people—have endured a long legacy of suffering, displacement, and dehumanization. While every nation has a foundational narrative that explains its origins and purpose, the story of our people has been silenced, distorted, and fragmented. Stripped of identity, language, and land, we were scattered across the globe and taught to forget who we truly are.

The historical and spiritual roots of this tragedy trace back not simply to the cruelty of human hands, but to a deeper, biblical truth: our disobedience to the Most High God—the God of Israel. This disobedience led to the fulfillment of the very curses outlined in Deuteronomy 28, where the Most High warned the children of Israel that if they failed to keep His commandments, devastating consequences would follow.

“And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.”
— Deuteronomy 28:68 (KJV)

This verse is a haunting prophecy that aligns chillingly with the Transatlantic Slave Trade, in which millions of Israelites were transported across the seas in slave ships, sold into captivity, and scattered to the four corners of the earth. The word “Egypt” here is symbolic of bondage (see Exodus 20:2)—and just as ancient Egypt represented servitude, so too did the Americas and Europe for our ancestors.

A Disinherited People in a Foreign Land

Through colonization, slavery, and systemic oppression, our names, languages, customs, and heritage were stolen. We were left serving our enemies and adopting their gods, customs, and ideologies. We were taught to worship in ways foreign to our ancestors, celebrate holidays never ordained by Scripture, and see ourselves through the eyes of those who enslaved us.

Society urges us to “move on” from slavery, yet constantly memorializes other atrocities like the Jewish Holocaust—which, while horrific and worthy of remembrance, is not the only genocide history has known. The Transatlantic Slave Trade, beginning in the 1400s and formalized in America in 1619, resulted in the death, rape, and cultural erasure of over 100 million people, making it one of the largest crimes against humanity ever recorded.

The Weight of Bywords and False Labels

Our identities were replaced with bywords—a fulfillment of Deuteronomy 28:37:

“And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the LORD shall lead thee.”

Words like “nigger,” “black,” “African-American,” “coon,” “darkie,” “mulatto,” and “savage” were never our true names—they were tools of psychological warfare, meant to devalue, dehumanize, and disconnect us from our God-given heritage. Even the term “Black” is rooted in negative symbolism. In color theory, black absorbs all light and reflects none—a metaphor historically used to associate darkness with evil, ignorance, and death.

So how long will we continue to identify with these imposed labels? When will we reclaim our identity as the children of Israel—a royal priesthood, a chosen people, called to walk in covenant with the Most High?

The Relevance of Our Past to Our Future

Understanding our past is essential to understanding our purpose. It was our disobedience—not merely human injustice—that led us into this state. And just as Scripture foretold our fall, it also foretells our awakening:

“And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee… and thou shalt return unto the Lord thy God… then the Lord thy God will turn thy captivity…”
— Deuteronomy 30:1–3

We are now in a time of awakening. Across the world, more and more descendants of the diaspora are rediscovering their true heritage, repenting, and returning to the commandments of the Most High. This spiritual reawakening is not about hate, but about healing, identity, and truth.

Conclusion: A Call to Remember and Return

Our story is not one of defeat—it is one of prophecy, endurance, and redemption. As we remember the suffering of our ancestors, we must also embrace the responsibility of returning to the path of righteousness. Our past was painful, but it holds the key to our future.

Let us no longer be defined by the bywords of our captors, but by the Word of our Creator

black history, racism, the brown girl dilemma

Black History: Emmett Louis Till

“Let the world see what they did to my boy.”
— Mamie Till-Mobley, mother of Emmett Till

These photographs are the property of their respective owners.

The Face of Deception: Revisiting the Lynching of Emmett Till and the Lie That Cost a Life

In one of the most chilling and defining moments of the American civil rights movement, 14-year-old Emmett Louis Till became a symbol of racial injustice, brutality, and the deadly consequences of false accusations. In 1955, a white woman, Carolyn Bryant Donham, falsely accused the teenager of making inappropriate advances toward her—a lie that ultimately led to his abduction, torture, and lynching at the hands of her husband and his half-brother.

The truth behind that lie would not fully surface for more than six decades.

A Lie That Cost a Life

In the summer of 1955, Emmett Till traveled from his hometown of Chicago, Illinois to Money, Mississippi, to visit relatives. While there, he entered Bryant’s Grocery and Meat Market, where he encountered Carolyn Bryant, a 21-year-old white woman and the wife of store owner Roy Bryant.

What happened next has been the subject of myth, outrage, and decades of distortion. Carolyn Bryant initially claimed that Till had made lewd remarks, grabbed her hand, and whistled at her—an unthinkable offense in the Jim Crow South, where racial segregation and white supremacy ruled.

Three nights later, Roy Bryant and his half-brother, J.W. Milam, forcibly entered the home of Till’s great-uncle, Mose Wright, and abducted Emmett at gunpoint. Till was brutally beaten, tortured, shot in the head, and his mutilated body was tied with barbed wire to a 75-pound cotton gin fan and dumped in the Tallahatchie River. His corpse was discovered three days later.

When Emmett’s body was returned to Chicago, his mother, Mamie Till-Mobley, made the courageous decision to hold an open-casket funeral, stating, “I wanted the world to see what they did to my boy.”

Photos of Till’s disfigured face, published in Jet Magazine, shocked the nation and galvanized the growing civil rights movement.

Decades Later: The Confession of a Lie

In 2007, author Timothy B. Tyson, while researching for his book The Blood of Emmett Till (Simon & Schuster, 2017), interviewed Carolyn Bryant Donham, who for the first time admitted that parts of her original story were untrue. She confessed that Emmett Till never physically touched or threatened her. Tyson wrote:

“She said, ‘Nothing that boy did could ever justify what happened to him.’“

This admission came more than 50 years too late. Neither Roy Bryant nor J.W. Milam ever faced justice; in fact, they openly confessed to the murder in a paid interview with Look Magazine in 1956, after being acquitted by an all-white jury. Double jeopardy laws protected them from being retried.

Donham’s late-life admission confirms what Black Americans had long known—that a white woman’s false testimony could mean a Black boy’s death, with impunity. The tragic irony is that justice was not delayed—it was denied.

A Pattern Still Seen Today

While Emmett Till’s story occurred nearly 70 years ago, it echoes in the modern era. The pattern of young Black men being killed due to suspicion, fear, or false accusation remains tragically relevant. From Trayvon Martin to Ahmaud Arbery, the legacy of racialized violence continues.

False accusations from white women have had lasting, deadly consequences—not just in the 20th century, but throughout American history. The archetype of the “dangerous Black man” and the “damsel in distress” has been weaponized to justify lynchings, wrongful imprisonments, and systemic injustice.

Even today, we are reminded that accountability for racial violence is rare, and white supremacy often wears a deceptively polite face.

The Historical Significance

The murder of Emmett Till became a catalyst for the civil rights movement. Just 100 days after his death, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama, later saying:

“I thought of Emmett Till, and I couldn’t go back.”

His story is not just a tale of brutality; it is a reminder of the importance of truth, memory, and resistance. Carolyn Bryant Donham died in 2023, never having faced charges, but the truth she tried to suppress lives on—and so does the movement Emmett inspired.

Conclusion: A Legacy That Demands Remembrance

To forget Emmett Till is to repeat the sins of the past. His death was not merely a result of racism, but of a deliberate lie—a lie told by a woman whose conscience may have long been seared by guilt, yet who lived free while his mother buried her only son.

As Mamie Till-Mobley urged, “Let the world see.” We must continue to see, to remember, and to demand justice not only for Emmett, but for every victim of racial injustice past and present.

References:

  • Tyson, Timothy B. The Blood of Emmett Till. Simon & Schuster, 2017.
  • Devery S. Anderson. Emmett Till: The Murder That Shocked the World and Propelled the Civil Rights Movement. University Press of Mississippi, 2015.
  • Jet Magazine, Sept. 15, 1955 – Funeral photos.
  • Look Magazine, January 1956 – Interview with Milam and Bryant.
  • Vanity Fair. “The Woman Who Killed Emmett Till.” Jan 26, 2017.

Carolyn Donham accused Emmet Till of flirting with her in 1955 revealing for the first time that those claims were fabricated.  

r

black history, Civil Rights Movement, racism, the brown boy dilemma

The Male Files: The Civil Rights Movement and Its Effect on the Male Psyche years later. #thebrownboydilemma

This photograph is the property of its respective owners. No copyright infringement intended

The Civil Rights Movement was more than a social revolution—it was a psychological awakening. For Black men in America, it reshaped not only how they were seen but also how they saw themselves. Decades of racial oppression, legal segregation, and economic disenfranchisement had fractured the male identity of many African American men, forcing them to exist between strength and survival. The fight for equality became a fight for restoration of dignity and manhood.

Before the movement, systemic racism and Jim Crow laws limited Black men’s ability to fulfill the traditional male role as provider and protector. Economic exclusion, racial terror, and criminalization created barriers to employment, education, and mobility. Sociologist E. Franklin Frazier (1939) wrote that the Black family was under “continuous economic and psychological assault.” These forces stripped Black men of the power to lead in their own homes and communities.

The male psyche under oppression developed a dual consciousness—what W. E. B. Du Bois (1903) called “two-ness.” Black men were forced to measure themselves by the white gaze while yearning to live authentically. They navigated a society that demanded compliance yet punished ambition. This internal tension bred both resilience and rage—a quiet storm of masculinity seeking meaning in a hostile world.

When the Civil Rights Movement emerged in the 1950s and 1960s, it reawakened something deeply spiritual within the Black male psyche. Marching, protesting, and organizing became acts of reclaiming agency. Leaders like Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and Medgar Evers embodied new models of manhood rooted in courage, discipline, and purpose. Their visibility and sacrifice redefined masculinity—not through dominance, but through moral strength and communal love.

Martin Luther King Jr. offered a model of nonviolent strength. His philosophy of love and moral courage required enormous self-control—a distinctly masculine restraint that challenged stereotypes of Black men as angry or animalistic. In contrast, Malcolm X represented the righteous fire of self-defense and Black pride. Together, they symbolized the balance between peace and power, intellect and instinct—two halves of the same wounded but rising psyche.

The televised brutality of the movement—the beatings, dogs, and police violence—also traumatized the male psyche. While the world saw Black men demanding justice, those same men carried unseen emotional scars. Psychologists today might recognize symptoms of racial trauma, including hypervigilance, anger, and internalized shame. The Civil Rights Movement both healed and hurt: it empowered men to stand tall, yet exposed them to violence that often lingered in their minds and bodies.

For many men, activism replaced silence with purpose. Protesting became therapy. The collective struggle provided identity, community, and pride that counteracted centuries of emasculation. The image of Black men marching in unity—dressed sharply, singing freedom songs—restored the psychological dignity that slavery and segregation had long denied. This was not just political; it was existential.

Yet, the post-movement era brought new challenges. The assassination of key leaders fractured the psyche again, creating a void in leadership and trust. The promised economic gains of civil rights legislation did not always reach Black men equally, and systemic barriers persisted through mass incarceration and job discrimination. Sociologist William Julius Wilson (1987) later argued that structural economic changes left many urban Black men in “social isolation,” fueling frustration and identity confusion.

This disillusionment led to a psychological shift. The same men who once marched for justice watched as drugs, unemployment, and violence eroded their communities in the 1970s and 1980s. The masculine pride awakened during the movement was now tested by a new kind of oppression—economic rather than legal, psychological rather than physical.

Still, the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement continued to shape Black male identity. It instilled a sense of purpose, pride, and intellectualism. Movements like Black Power and later Black Lives Matter drew from that foundation, redefining manhood yet again for new generations. Today’s Black men inherit both the pain and the pride of that era.

Psychologically, the Civil Rights Movement demonstrated that masculinity could coexist with compassion. It taught that being a man was not about control or dominance, but about courage, moral integrity, and service to one’s people. It showed that liberation was not only external but internal—a renewal of the mind.

Spirituality also played a central role in restoring the Black male psyche. Churches became safe spaces for leadership and self-expression. Men preached, organized, sang, and strategized under the belief that God was on their side. This faith-centered masculinity anchored many during times of despair and humiliation.

At the same time, the movement’s gender dynamics revealed tension. While men were often in leadership roles, women were the backbone of the struggle. This imbalance sometimes reinforced patriarchal norms, shaping how Black men viewed leadership and emotional vulnerability. Healing the male psyche also meant confronting these inherited notions of power.

The Civil Rights Movement thus reshaped the psychology of Black manhood into something complex and evolving. It created space for vulnerability, empathy, and collective identity—qualities once dismissed as weakness. It also forced men to reckon with their trauma, to define strength beyond stoicism.

In today’s society, echoes of that psychological transformation remain. The modern Black man carries both the strength of his ancestors and the scars of their struggles. He is a product of resilience—a living testament to survival against systems designed to destroy his mind, spirit, and masculinity.

Ultimately, the Civil Rights Movement did more than change laws—it changed men. It birthed a new consciousness that redefined what it means to be a man under oppression. The movement proved that liberation begins first in the mind, then in the world. The fight for civil rights was—and remains—a fight for psychological freedom.

References

Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago: A. C. McClurg & Co.

Frazier, E. F. (1939). The Negro Family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

King, M. L. Jr. (1963). Strength to Love. New York: Harper & Row.

Wilson, W. J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Watkins, W. H. (2005). The Assault on Public Education: Confronting the Politics of Corporate School Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

black history, the brown girl dilemma

Malcolm X delivers…

Excerpt from a speech given by Malcolm X at the University of Ghana, 13 May 1964.

“I don’t feel that I am a visitor in Ghana or in any part of Africa. I feel that I am at home. I’ve been away for four hundred years, [Laughter] but not of my own volition, not of my own will. Our people didn’t go to America on the Queen Mary, we didn’t go by Pan American, and we didn’t go to America on the Mayflower. We went in slave ships, we went in chains. We weren’t immigrants to America, we were cargo for purposes of a system that was bent upon making a profit. So this is the category or level of which I speak. I may not speak it in the language many of you would use, but I think you will understand the meaning of my terms.

When I was in Ibadan [in Nigeria] at the University of Ibadan last Friday night, the students there gave me a new name, which I go for—meaning I like it. [Laughter] Omowale, which they say means in Yoruba—if I am pronouncing that correctly, and if I am not pronouncing it correctly it’s because I haven’t had a chance to pronounce it for four hundred years [Laughter]—which means in that dialect, The child has returned. It was an honor for me to be referred to as a child who had sense enough to return to the land of his forefathers—to his fatherland and to his motherland. Not sent back here by the State Department, [Laughter] but come back here of my own free will.” [Applause]

— Malcolm X

black history, Human Zoos, racism

Black/African History: The Human Zoos

This photograph is the property of its respective owners.


Human Zoos: Colonial Spectacle and the Dehumanization of Black Bodies

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Europe and the United States hosted infamous exhibitions known as “human zoos”—or ethnological expositions—in cities such as Paris, London, Antwerp, Hamburg, Milan, Barcelona, and New York. These public displays featured Black Africans, Indigenous peoples, and other non‑European groups in staged “native villages” or zoo-like settings for mass spectatorship. Visiting audiences, numbering in the tens or even hundreds of thousands per event, were encouraged to gawk at foreigners presented as “primitive” or “savage” (Blanchard et al., 2011; Westin, 2020).

Purpose and Origins

Human zoos were born from colonial ambition and scientific racism. European imperial powers used these displays to validate their civilizing missions and assert racial hierarchies, equating whiteness with civilization and darkness with primitiveness (Qureshi, 2011). At the 1895 African Exhibition in London’s Crystal Palace, for example, Somalis were brought from Somaliland to perform daily rituals, war dances, and village routines in artificial huts—reinforcing notions of racial inferiority to European culture (Wikipedia, 2025) Wikipedia+1Foreign Affairs Forum+1Wikipedia.

Scientific Racism and Eugenics

Figures such as Carl Hagenbeck, Madison Grant, William Temple Hornaday, and Henry Fairfield Osborn played central roles in the popularization of human zoos. They argued, using social Darwinist reasoning, that certain races were biologically superior—thus justifying colonial domination through pseudo‑scientific authority (Brepols, 2025; Osborn & Grant writings) The New Yorker+5brepolsonline.net+5The Hill+5.

Ota Benga and the Bronx Zoo Exhibit

One of the most infamous cases was that of Ota Benga, a Congolese man exhibited in 1904 at the St. Louis World’s Fair and again in 1906 in the Bronx Zoo’s “Monkey House,” where he was caged alongside apes. This spectacle drew nearly 250,000 visitors in just a few days. Prominent figures such as Madison Grant and Hornaday defended the exhibition as scientific and educational, while African American ministers condemned it as profoundly degrading (New Yorker, 2022; Guardian, 2015; CNN, 2015) Wikipedia+12The New Yorker+12The Bronx Daily | Bronx.com+12.

Public outcry by Black clergy led to Benga’s temporary release, and decades later (2020), the Bronx Zoo formally apologized for its “unconscionable racial intolerance” (NBC, 2020) Wikipedia+13NBC New York+13The Hill+13.

Wider European Exhibits

Across Europe, nations hosted dozens of human zoos. In Brussels (1897), a Congolese “village” with more than 250 individuals was displayed; at least seven reportedly died during the exhibit (Foreign Affairs Forum, 2025) CNN+5Nofi Media+5Foreign Affairs Forum+5. Spain hosted Algerians, Filipinos, and Fang people in exhibitions that lasted into the 1940s (Wikipedia, 2025) WikipediaNofi Media.

Why European Societies Exhibited Black People

The motives were several:

  1. Imperialist Propaganda: To glorify colonial rule and justify exploitation of “inferior” peoples.
  2. Scientific Legitimization: Ethnologists used live exhibits to “prove” racial hierarchies and evolutionary differences (Blanchard et al., 2011) The Washington Post+9Foreign Affairs Forum+9understandingslavery.com+9Wikipedia+10Wikipedia+10The Bronx Daily | Bronx.com+10.
  3. Mass Entertainment: These exhibitions attracted millions, reinforcing racist stereotypes through spectacle (Foreigh Affairs Forum, 2025) Foreign Affairs Forum.

Legacy and Psychological Impact

These dehumanizing exhibitions inflicted trauma on those displayed and reinforced widespread racism. Between 1870 and 1940, over 1.4 billion people attended such exhibitions, conditioning generations to perceive Black bodies as exotic curiosities rather than equal humans (Foreign Affairs Forum, 2025) Foreign Affairs Forum.

Moreover, these spectacles shaped advertising, postcards, academic narratives, and politics—embedding a distorted racial gaze that persisted long after the exhibitions ended (Humanzoos.net) Human Zoos+3Nofi Media+3Wikipedia+3.

Conclusion

Human zoos were not innocent curiosities but instruments of oppression. They brought colonial logic into popular culture, weaponizing display as a means of asserting hierarchies and denying humanity. By analyzing these exhibitions through historical, scientific, and ethical lenses, we confront the roots of modern racism and articulate why Europeans treated Black people with such systemic cruelty. Understanding this history is essential to dismantling lingering racial bias and reaffirming the dignity of every human being.

References

black history, Buck-breaking, racism, sex farms

Black History: Buck Breaking/Breaking the Buck and Sex Farms.

This photograph is the property of its respective owner.


Buck-Breaking: A Historical Analysis of Sexual Violence, Power, and Psychological Warfare During American Slavery

“Buck-breaking” was a term associated with one of the most heinous and dehumanizing practices employed during the transatlantic slavery era, particularly in the Caribbean and parts of the American South. This form of sexual violence was a deliberate tool of psychological and social control, weaponized by white slaveholders to emasculate enslaved Black men, traumatize enslaved families, and dismantle any sense of resistance within the Black community.

Definition and Origins

The term buck-breaking refers to the forced sexual violation of enslaved Black men—referred to derogatorily as “bucks” by slaveholders—typically by white male enslavers. Though not widely discussed in mainstream historical texts, references to such acts are found in historical accounts, oral traditions, and emerging scholarship on slavery and sexual violence. The practice is believed to have been most rampant in the Caribbean, particularly in Jamaica and Barbados, but was also used in the American South to suppress rebellion and instill fear (Fanon, 2008; Patterson, 1982).

Purpose of Buck-Breaking

The purpose of buck-breaking was multifaceted. First, it served as a method of breaking the spirit of enslaved Black men who displayed signs of resistance or insubordination. By publicly humiliating them through sexual violence, slave owners sought to destroy their masculinity and assert total dominance. Secondly, it psychologically devastated enslaved women and children who were forced to witness the violation of their husbands, fathers, and sons. The psychological terror inflicted served as a preventive mechanism against organized rebellion (Hine, 1994).

Moreover, by using sexual violence as a spectacle, white enslavers aimed to invert traditional gender roles and strip Black men of agency, pride, and familial authority. This public act of dehumanization sent a clear message: resistance would be met with degradation, not just punishment.

Psychological Impact and Legacy

The psychological impact of such acts cannot be overstated. Enslaved families who witnessed these violations were left traumatized, with long-term implications for self-worth, masculinity, and kinship bonds. As psychiatrist Frantz Fanon (2008) noted in Black Skin, White Masks, the colonial project was not merely about physical domination but also psychological fragmentation—an internalized sense of inferiority reinforced through brutality and humiliation.

In the post-slavery era, the trauma of buck-breaking has been theorized to contribute to various sociocultural dynamics within the African American community, including distrust, the suppression of vulnerability in men, and familial disintegration.

Modern Symbolism and Myths

One controversial claim connects the modern trend of “sagging pants” to buck-breaking, arguing that it originated as a marker of sexual violation during slavery. While this claim is popular in some Afrocentric and activist circles, it is not widely supported by mainstream historical scholarship. Most academic sources trace sagging to 20th-century prison culture, where belts were often confiscated (Alexander, 2010).

Nevertheless, such narratives—true or symbolic—reflect ongoing struggles to interpret and reclaim historical trauma in a modern context.

The Caste System and Sexual Politics of Slavery

Buck-breaking fits within a broader racial caste system that valorized whiteness and weaponized Blackness. Enslaved Black men were commodified based on perceived physical strength and virility, which made their bodies both a source of economic productivity and sexual threat in the eyes of the white supremacist regime. This further justified acts of violence to control, neuter, and dehumanize them. Scholar Saidiya Hartman (1997) has written extensively on how the Black body, particularly during slavery, was the site of spectacular violence and commodified suffering.

The practice was employed as a strategic tool to:

  • Emasculate enslaved men and negate any sense of masculine authority or defiance, thus neutralizing potential rebellion.
  • Instill terror among enslaved communities by forcing families and peers to witness the sexual shame of defiance (Urban Dictionary; Face2Face Africa) Wyatt O’Brian Evans.
  • Reinforce power dynamics, making clear that black bodies were commodities to be abused and controlled.

According to emerging scholarship, “sex farms” were plantations or compound-like areas maintained for the systematic sexual exploitation of enslaved men. Slaveholders allegedly transported enslaved males from plantation to plantation for group sexual assaults, creating a traveling circuit—a grotesque and institutionalized practice (RasTafari TV) rastafari.tv.

The trauma of buck-breaking became a weapon of psychological subjugation. Witnessing a father or brother publicly violated aimed to:

  • Undermine self-worth and family cohesion.
  • Criminalize resistance internally: enslaved men who survived this abuse often left trauma not addressed and seldom spoken of (Jennings & White, via Project MUSE; TalkAfricana) Reddit+13Project MUSE+13TalkAfricana+13.

Scholars argue the degradation of masculinity under slavery contributed to long-term disruptions in identity, familial protective roles, and community cohesion (Jennings et al.; Fanon’s frameworks) Project MUSETalkAfricana.

Slaveholders also operated breeding farms where enslaved women—and sometimes men—were forcibly impregnated to increase the enslaved labor force. While breeding farms chiefly targeted women, male exploitation was part of the broader system of sexual commodification (Wikipedia; Sublette) rastafari.tv+5Wikipedia+5Wikipedia+5.

Due to stigma and silencing, rape of male slaves was rarely documented in legal records. Most evidence appears in slave narratives and case studies—making direct quantification difficult, yet multiple historians affirm these abuses occurred (Project MUSE; TalkAfricana) Wikipedia+15Project MUSE+15TalkAfricana+15.

Deuteronomy 28:68 (KJV)

“And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.”

This verse is part of the curses listed in Deuteronomy 28 for Israel’s disobedience, and many in the African American and Hebrew communities interpret it as a prophetic reference to the transatlantic slave trade, including the horrific abuses such as buck-breaking. It reflects divine foresight into the suffering of a people taken into captivity by ships, sold into slavery, and dehumanized.

Lamentations 5:11–13 (KJV)

“They ravished the women in Zion, and the maids in the cities of Judah. Princes are hanged up by their hand: the faces of elders were not honoured. They took the young men to grind, and the children fell under the wood.”

This passage mourns the violent humiliation and abuse of both men and women in the time of Judah’s destruction. The word “ravished” refers to rape and sexual abuse, and “took the young men to grind” is understood by many biblical scholars to imply forced labor and sexual humiliation.

Isaiah 3:9 (KJV)

“The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.”

While originally a rebuke to the people of Judah, this verse indicts all who, like the men of Sodom, openly commit abominable acts—such as sexual assault or humiliation—and refuse to repent. It reflects God’s judgment against those who violate others.

Conclusion and Theological Reflections

The atrocity of buck-breaking is not merely a historical footnote—it is a wound in the collective memory of the African diaspora. Understanding it is crucial to unpacking the complex intersection of race, sexuality, power, and trauma. For believers, it is also a call to lament, to pursue justice, and to reclaim dignity lost through centuries of dehumanization. Scripture reminds us that every person is made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27), and that the destruction of one’s dignity—especially through acts of sexual violence—is an affront to the Creator Himself. Deliverance from such trauma involves truth-telling, communal healing, and a return to a biblical vision of wholeness, where no one’s humanity is reduced to their body, race, or utility.

References:

Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. The New Press.

Fanon, F. (2008). Black Skin, White Masks (R. Philcox, Trans.). Grove Press.

Hartman, S. (1997). Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. Oxford University Press.

Hine, D. C. (1994). Hine Sight: Black Women and the Re-construction of American History. Indiana University Press.

Patterson, O. (1982). Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Harvard University Press.

Face2Face Africa. (2019). 5 horrifying ways enslaved African men were sexually exploited and abused by their white masters 3CHICSPOLITICO+1Wyatt O’Brian Evans+1.


Jennings, T. A., et al. (2024). Sexual abuse of Black men under American slavery. Project MUSE Journal. Project MUSE


TalkAfricana. (2023, May 30). Buck Breaking: How slave masters used rape to emasculate enslaved African men. TalkAfricana


RasTafari TV. (2024). Sex farms during slavery & the effeminization of Black Men. Wikipedia+13rastafari.tv+13Project MUSE+13

colorism, skin lightening, the brown girl dilemma

Fair Is Lovely — The Color Complex and the Global Obsession with Light Skin.

This photograph is the property of its respective owner. No copyright infringement intended.

“My teenage years were plagued by the idea that light skin was better skin. There were adverts on TV … I felt that I was not considered beautiful because of my complexion. My self-worth was deeply compromised in those years.” –– Lupita Nyong’o

Throughout history, beauty has not merely been an aesthetic pursuit but a reflection of power, status, and identity. The modern obsession with light skin, despite its dangers and toxic implications, is one of the most telling examples of how deeply colonialism has shaped global perceptions of worth. Even in the face of severe health risks from mercury-based skin-whitening creams, millions continue to use them, driven by an invisible yet powerful ideology: that lighter is better.

To understand this fixation, one must first look to history. The global conquest of Europe during the colonial era redefined the hierarchy of human value. Through political domination, missionary education, and cultural imperialism, whiteness was not only privileged but sanctified. From Africa to Asia, and the Caribbean to Latin America, colonized people internalized the myth that white skin was the mark of civility, intelligence, and beauty (Hunter, 2007).

During the Renaissance period, this idealization of whiteness was reinforced through art, literature, and religion. White women were portrayed in paintings as divine, ethereal, and pure. Pale skin became a symbol of wealth and class, as only those who did not labor under the sun could afford to be fair. This visual narrative of “fairness equals virtue” became embedded in the social consciousness of the Western world (Glenn, 2008).

As colonialism expanded, these Eurocentric ideals traveled globally, becoming the beauty gospel imposed upon darker nations. Fair skin became not just a preference but a social passport. In many societies, lighter complexions opened doors to better marriage prospects, employment opportunities, and higher social standing. This stratification birthed what sociologists call colorism—a system of discrimination based on skin tone within one’s own race (Russell, Wilson & Hall, 2013).

In Asia, the legacy of colonialism and caste further reinforced this mindset. Skin-lightening creams became billion-dollar industries in countries like India, South Korea, and the Philippines. Advertisements depicted fair-skinned women as more successful, desirable, and confident, cementing the false equation between fairness and happiness. The slogan “Fair is Lovely,” once used by a leading Indian brand, became both a marketing triumph and a cultural tragedy.

Africa, too, bears the scars of this color complex. The introduction of European beauty standards during colonial occupation devalued the natural features of Black people. From hair texture to skin tone, everything dark was labeled “undesirable.” As a result, some individuals began using harmful bleaching agents to emulate European features, unaware that they were absorbing toxins and erasing the beauty of their own heritage (Charles, 2009).

In the Americas, the legacy of slavery compounded these issues. Enslaved Africans with lighter skin were often given preferential treatment, allowed to work in the master’s house rather than in the fields. This created divisions within the Black community that persist today, where lighter skin is often perceived as more acceptable or beautiful, echoing the “house slave versus field slave” dichotomy (Keith & Herring, 1991).

The psychological damage of colorism runs deep. It fosters self-hatred, envy, and a lifelong pursuit of unattainable beauty standards. The constant bombardment of light-skinned models in magazines, movies, and advertisements perpetuates the illusion that dark skin is something to overcome rather than embrace. The media, acting as the modern missionary, continues to preach the gospel of whiteness through filters, Photoshop, and casting decisions.

Yet, this obsession is not born of vanity alone—it is a byproduct of systemic conditioning. Generations have been raised to equate whiteness with success and darkness with deficiency. This internalized racism manifests as economic behavior: billions spent annually on skin-lightening products, surgeries, and treatments, often marketed as “brightening” or “toning” to disguise their true purpose (Glenn, 2008).

Spiritually, this phenomenon mirrors the biblical warning against conforming to worldly standards. Romans 12:2 (KJV) reminds believers: “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind.” The obsession with lightness is a form of conformity—a submission to a false idol of beauty that profits from insecurity.

Psychologically, the pursuit of lighter skin reflects an inferiority complex rooted in generational trauma. When an entire race has been told for centuries that they are less than human, the desire to approximate the oppressor’s image becomes a coping mechanism, albeit a destructive one. This cycle of psychological bondage mirrors the words of Proverbs 23:7 (KJV): “For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he.”

Health-wise, the implications are severe. Mercury, hydroquinone, and corticosteroids—common in bleaching products—cause skin thinning, kidney failure, neurological damage, and in extreme cases, death. What begins as a quest for beauty often ends in tragedy, revealing the literal toxicity of self-rejection.

However, a global awakening is underway. Movements such as “Dark Is Beautiful” in India and “Melanin Poppin’” in the United States are reclaiming the beauty of darker tones. Black and brown creators are challenging the dominance of Eurocentric beauty on social media, promoting self-love, and redefining what it means to be beautiful.

The conversation around skin color is not merely cosmetic—it is cultural, political, and spiritual. To embrace one’s melanin is to resist centuries of indoctrination and to honor the divine craftsmanship of creation. Genesis 1:27 (KJV) declares, “So God created man in his own image.” If all shades come from God, then no shade is superior.

Media responsibility also plays a crucial role in dismantling this narrative. Representation matters. When darker-skinned women are seen as heroines, scholars, and leaders, they challenge the subconscious biases formed through decades of white-centered beauty imagery. Change in perception begins with visibility.

Economically, promoting natural beauty empowers local industries and rejects exploitative global beauty chains that profit from colonial residue. Supporting melanin-positive brands is an act of resistance—a declaration that beauty no longer bows to a Eurocentric ideal.

In conclusion, the obsession with fair skin is neither new nor benign. It is the residue of colonization, perpetuated through art, religion, and commerce. The solution lies in education, representation, and spiritual renewal. To reclaim beauty in all its shades is to reclaim one’s identity, worth, and freedom from psychological slavery.

When people learn to see themselves as God created them—fearfully and wonderfully made—the market for inferiority collapses. The true revolution begins not with lighter skin, but with enlightened minds.

References (APA 7th Edition)

Charles, C. A. D. (2009). Skin bleaching, self-hate, and black identity in Jamaica. Journal of Black Studies, 40(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934708315587

Glenn, E. N. (2008). Yearning for lightness: Transnational circuits in the marketing and consumption of skin lighteners. Gender & Society, 22(3), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208316089

Hunter, M. (2007). The persistent problem of colorism: Skin tone, status, and inequality. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00006.x

Keith, V. M., & Herring, C. (1991). Skin tone and stratification in the Black community. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 760–778. https://doi.org/10.1086/229819

Russell, K., Wilson, M., & Hall, R. (2013). The Color Complex (Revised): The Politics of Skin Color Among African Americans. Anchor Books.

The Holy Bible, King James Version. (n.d.). Bible Gateway. https://www.biblegateway.com

black history, racism

Black History: Leopold II of Belgium

Leopold II of Belgium AKA The Devil Leopold



He skinned my people
Castrated my brothers
Raped my sisters
And brutally murdered my people
All in the name of the Devil
He is the Devil incarnate

King Leopold II of Belgium: Lineage, Tyranny, and the Congo Atrocities

King Leopold II (born Leopold Louis Philip Marie Victor; 1835–1909) reigned as King of the Belgians from 1865 until his death, succeeding Leopold I (Britannica, 2025). He belonged to the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha and was a first cousin to Queen Victoria of Britain. In 1853, he married Marie-Henriette of Austria, and together they had several children, though none of his sons survived to adulthood (Wikipedia, 2025). His rule over Belgium was constitutional, but he became infamous for personally owning and exploiting the vast territory known as the Congo Free State (Wikipedia, 2025; Britannica, 2025).

The Congo Free State: Private Empire and Devastation

In 1885, at the Berlin Conference, European powers granted Leopold jurisdiction over the Congo Basin, under the guise of humanitarian mission and civilization. However, he administered the territory as his private enterprise, exploiting its natural wealth—particularly ivory and rubber—through coercive labor, forced quotas, and extreme violence enforced by the Force Publique, his mercenary army (Wikipedia, 2025; Britannica, 2025).

The consequences were catastrophic. Adam Hochschild described Leopold’s project as a “genocidal plundering” that caused the deaths of approximately 10 million Congolese people, through brutal violence, starvation, and disease (Wikipedia, 2025; New Yorker, 2015). Population-loss estimates range from 5 million to 13 million, with the most widely accepted figure around 10 million (Wikipedia, 2025).

Leopold’s Ideology and Racial Violence

Leopold’s colonial ideology was deeply grounded in scientific racism and Eurocentric paternalism. He justified his rule in the Congo as a civilizing mission, though in reality it facilitated systematic terror, mutilation, rape, and forced labor (Casement Report, 1904). A 1904 investigation by Roger Casement, commissioned by the British government, exposed widespread atrocities committed under Leopold’s authority—including cutting off hands for missed rubber quotas, castration, and mass violence (Casement Report, 1904; Wikipedia, 2025).

Why Did Leopold Target Black People So Harshly?

Leopold’s racial hostility was institutional rather than personal. Africans were treated as subhuman labor to be exploited for personal wealth. Violence was a tool to suppress resistance, ensure compliance, and perpetuate a racial hierarchy that dehumanized native populations (Hochschild, 1999). The global popularity of eugenics and social-Darwinian thought in Europe and America validated these acts, enabling them under the cloak of colonial legitimacy.

Legacy and Comparison to Other Tyrants

Historians often place Leopold alongside Hitler and Stalin in terms of absolute cruelty, yet his actions remain less recognized internationally. Leopold’s reign precipitated one of history’s most extensive humanitarian disasters—yet his atrocities were shrouded under euphemistic justifications until international activists, missionaries, and journalists exposed the truth (Hochschild, 1999; New Yorker, 2015).

Conclusion

King Leopold II’s personal ambition created a private colonial state defined by terror. Between 1885 and 1908, his rule in the Congo wrought famine, mutilation, and mass death on an unimaginable scale. This genocide—the greatest in African colonial history—reflects how unchecked power, racial supremacism, and capitalist greed can combine to produce catastrophic violence.

📚 References

  • Adam Hochschild. (1999). King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa.
  • Britannica. (2025). King Leopold II. Encyclopedia Britannica.
  • Casement, R. (1904). Report on the Congo Atrocities. British Parliamentary Papers.
  • Wikipedia. (2025). King Leopold II of Belgium; Atrocities in the Congo Free State.
  • New Yorker. (2015). The Elephant in the Courtroom.

the brown girl dilemma

Who Do They Say We Are?

And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the Lord shall lead thee. Deuteronomy 28:37

NIGGERS * SPICS *COONS * DARKIES * BLACK * UGLY * MULATTOS *FEEBLE MINDED * UNFIT * IMBECILES * IMMORAL * CRIMINAL * CATTLE * SLAVES
NEGROES * AFRO THIS OR THAT *MONKIES *  SAVAGES * COLORED *JUNGLE BUNNIES * DIRT *JIGABOOS * ANIMALS *WET BACKS * SPOOKS *SAMBOO * ASIATIC BLACK
MIXED * BIRACIAL* MULTIRACIAL * BURNT And so forth… Code words used to establish slavery.

We exist under the myriad complexities of slavery even today

1619-1834 Slaves
1834-1892 Coons/Colored
1892-1934 Niggers/Niggas
1934-1970 Boy/Africans
1970-1983 Afro Americans
1983-2002 Black Americans
2002-2016 African Americans 

The answer: Romans 12:1

“I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.”

colorism, darkism

Darkism Uncovered: An Exclusive Interview with the First Darkism Activist, Rashida Strober.

 In the landscape of American performance arts and racial activism, few figures have emerged with the visceral intensity and unapologetic candor of Rashida Strober. A Florida native and self-proclaimed “Dark-Skin Activist,” Strober has galvanized national and international attention for her groundbreaking work that brings the realities of colorism and Black female marginalization into sharp, theatrical relief. Her life story, an intricate blend of tragedy, survival, and triumph, reflects the collective struggle of dark-skinned Black women across the African diaspora—especially those who have borne the brunt of beauty hierarchies predicated upon Eurocentric standards.

Rashida Strober, “The Dark-Skin Activist,” stands unapologetically in her truth—bold, brilliant, and unbreakable—redefining beauty and power for melanated women around the world.

From the depths of childhood abuse and social alienation to the heights of creative excellence and advocacy, Strober’s work transcends the stage and touches the pulse of systemic injustice. She is not merely a performer but a prophetess of truth, using her voice, pen, and body as sacred instruments to declare: dark skin is not a defect; it is divine.

A Life Marked by Pain and Power

Born in St. Petersburg, Florida, Rashida Strober was the only girl among five brothers. Her early life was plagued with ridicule, economic instability, and trauma. At school, she endured brutal mockery from classmates and peers, frequently labeled with slurs such as “black and ugly,” “monkey mouth,” and “African booty scratcher.” These insults reflected a pervasive social pathology: colorism—a hierarchical system of discrimination that privileges light skin over dark within and beyond Black communities (Hunter, 2007).

At the tender age of 14, Strober found herself homeless, a victim of sexual exploitation and neglect. Yet even in these dark corridors of despair, her dream of becoming an actress refused to die. With relentless determination, she earned her GED, secured stable employment, saved for housing, and enrolled in college. Eventually, she obtained a Master’s degree in Political Science from the University of South Florida.

Her story is an empirical counter-narrative to the myth of Black inferiority, one that aligns with the scriptural exhortation from the Apocrypha:

“For gold is tried in the fire, and acceptable men in the furnace of adversity.” (Ecclesiasticus [Sirach] 2:5, KJV Apocrypha)

Theater as Activism: From Pain to Platform

Rashida’s foray into theater was not merely artistic; it was revolutionary. In 2006, she wrote, produced, and starred in The Ice Cream Lady’s Dream, a deeply autobiographical one-woman show chronicling her harrowing yet triumphant journey. That same year, she launched A Dark Skin Woman’s Revenge, a play that ignited a global conversation about the emotional, romantic, and professional struggles of dark-skinned women. Through this theatrical masterpiece, Strober enacted multiple characters, each representing distinct facets of pain and power in the lives of melanated women.

Her ability to inhabit various psychological states, particularly in her role as Georgana Nelson—a mentally ill dark-skinned woman subjected to systemic and familial abuse—earned her the 2012 Playwrights Red Carpet Award for Actress of the Year. Her performance resonates with the biblical lamentation:

“Woe is me now! for the Lord hath added grief to my sorrow; I fainted in my sighing, and I find no rest.” (Baruch 3:1, KJV Apocrypha)

Strober is also the founder of ICLD Productions and creator of Dark Skin TV, the first internet show exclusively focused on issues affecting dark-skinned women. Her authorship includes five books, notably Darkism, in which she deconstructs the covert and overt mechanisms of skin-tone discrimination in contemporary society.

Interview with Rashida Strober from my book – The Brown Girl Dilemma,

Q: What are a few of your experiences as a dark-skinned woman?
Rashida: I remember being called the blackest and ugliest girl in school by a boy I referred to as “Seedy.” That incident left a psychological mark. Even now, I sometimes fear being around Black men because I wonder if they see me as ugly, too.

Q: Who had the greatest impact on your life?
Rashida: My seventh-grade teacher, Mattie Everette. She saw something in me when others didn’t.

Q: What do you think is the solution to the light-skinned/dark-skinned divide?
Rashida: Pure honesty. We must own the fact that dark-skinned beauty discrimination exists. Only then can we address it.

Q: What is something people don’t know about you?
Rashida: I was homeless. I was raped. I’ve known pain intimately, but I’ve also known deliverance.

Colorism and the Mirror of Self-Perception

As a light-skinned Black woman, I have come to recognize the complex interplay between privilege and empathy within my lived experience. While residing in Germany, I was frequently complimented on my appearance—initially attributing this affirmation solely to conventional beauty. However, with time and reflection, I realized that these perceptions were also shaped by the societal preference for lighter skin, revealing an unspoken privilege I had long overlooked.

This observation is critical, for it highlights the intersectional burden of shade-based bias. Lighter skin has, historically, functioned as both social currency and silent enabler in systems of intra-racial bias (Russell, Wilson, & Hall, 1992).

This admission is not an indictment but a confession that aims to dismantle the binary of blame. As the writer aptly states: “We are all of the colors… if one of a different shade is honored, it should be applied to all.”

This resonates with the biblical wisdom from the Apocrypha:

“Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother’s children were angry with me; they made me the keeper of the vineyards; but mine own vineyard have I not kept.” (Song of Solomon 1:6, KJV)

Conclusion: The Revolution Must Be Humanized

The Rashida Strober story is not an isolated narrative—it is emblematic of a broader societal ailment that refuses to reconcile beauty with Blackness unless whiteness is somehow attached. Her journey confronts the world with an unsettling truth: the battle against white supremacy begins with confronting the enemy within—the colonial gaze that still inhabits our mirrors, our schools, our relationships, and our institutions.

Through her voice, Strober urges us not to pity her, but to stand with her. To see the light in the dark. To dismantle the walls of pigmentocracy. And to teach a new generation of Black girls that their value does not come from Eurocentric molds, but from their Creator and their culture.

As Ecclesiasticus affirms:

“Give not thy soul unto a woman to set her foot upon thy substance. Seek not out things that are too hard for thee… but in the multitude of the wise is the welfare of the world.”
(Ecclesiasticus 7:24; 3:21; 6:24, KJV Apocrypha)

References

  • Ecclesiasticus (Sirach), KJV Apocrypha
  • Rachida Strober, Darkism
  • The Brown Girl Dilemma, 2017
  • Song of Solomon, KJV
  • Hunter, M. (2007). The Persistent Problem of Colorism: Skin Tone, Status, and Inequality. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 237–254.
  • Russell, K., Wilson, M., & Hall, R. (1992). The Color Complex: The Politics of Skin Color Among African Americans. Harcourt Brace.

Where faith, history, and truth illuminate the Black experience.

THE BROWN GIRL DILEMMA

Where faith, history, and truth illuminate the Black experience.

Skip to content ↓